New name emerges in JFK assassination investigation

preview_player
Показать описание
Рекомендации по теме
Комментарии
Автор

The fact that all the documents have yet to be released says everything you need to know. They're protecting themselves.

josephmango
Автор

WE THE PEOPLE deserve and demand to know what happened 60 years ago, by not releasing said documents just goes to show ya that there's a cover up, its really sad that the government thinks that the American people are that stupid

kevincheney
Автор

Only the guilty withhold documents. Their actions betray them.

Mike-fxeu
Автор

It's been 60 years since JFK's assassination. Release all of the documents!

brucebarthold
Автор

From the moment JFK was killed this country spiraled down hill. That was the turning point in our country's history. 😢😢😢

williemoreno
Автор

Whatever Oswald’s role in the assassination was, one thing seems clear. He was not a “lone-nut.”

johntapscott
Автор

Kennedy was a pacifist. He was surrounded by war hawks who wanted escalation in Vietnam, as did arms manufacturers, the Industrial Military Complex, they are still influential today. Kennedy wanted to disband and clear out the CIA, Allen Dulles was infuriated by this, GWBush was in Dallas that day. JEdgar Hoover hated the Kennedys and the Mafia was furious at Robert Kennedy for going after them. They felt betrayed after they got the unions to back Kennedy and Bobby was interrogating Hoffa. All interconnected. Let’s not forget Lyndon Johnson who was to appear in court on criminal charges. He was connected to all these people. Nixon indicated that Johnson was the lynch pin to all these interested parties. Telling the American people would mean they would realise how corrupt the country was and how corrupt their leaders were. People need to have faith in their government, this would reveal too much. It’s such a shame because Kennedy was invested in doing the best for all Americans.

francesmoore
Автор

CIA knew and failed to prevent it
Or CIA blatantly had a hand in orchestrating it.

tinkertanner
Автор

The government probably believed that telling the truth would be too much for the American people. But it’s been over 60 years. It’s time to tell us what happened to the president.

Heather-xzfk
Автор

So it is now up to each agency to continue breaking the law at their whim. Funny, the last time that I looked if anyone does not follow a court order it is called contempt and the person refusing to provide the information is to be held in jail until the time that the information is divulged. Put these a-holes in jail until they give up the documents. It is fair, it is the law and it is enforceable. Otherwise we live in something other than a democracy or a republic. This is total nonsense.

charlesrobbins
Автор

Of course, the CIA was watching Lee Oswald's every move and monitoring everything they could, including his mail, telephone calls, and conversations in his home or other residence. The CIA had to do this to ensure that their patsies were doing what the CIA wanted them to do. I mean, what would the CIA do if Oswald decided to spend 100% of his time in the TSBD second-floor lunch room throughout the entire time that JFK went through Dealey Plaza and JFK got assassinated, and remained there instead of getting back to his residence and then onto the Texas Theater? Witnesses would testify that they saw Oswald the entire time in the lunchroom and there would be no Texas Theater arrest. That would mean the CIA would have no other patsy to pin the blame on while their professional killers took out JFK. The CIA would look really bad because they wouldn't be able to make Oswald play the patsy role they designed for him. But Oswald was an obedient spy and followed the CIA's instructions to a "T." This new guy mentioned in this story, Reuben Effron, was just doing his job to make sure that Oswald was following the CIA's orders, which he was--to his detriment. Too bad Oswald thought he was a double agent working on behalf of the CIA and believed what the CIA told him; i.e., that he was a double agent pretending to be a "Marxist" in one role and investigating threats against the President in his other role. And when he avoided getting killed at the Texas Theater, and said on camera that he was "just a patsy, " the CIA was forced to go through their Mob members of the CIA's team to get Ruby to kill Oswald that weekend, so he couldn't say a word more about what he was actually doing for the CIA.

jamesfeldman
Автор

The respect I had of the American government is gone forever

peterhaokip
Автор

Why would the government release evidence that incriminates itself 🤦🏻‍♀️😉

justsayin
Автор

I can solve the JFK conspiracy with three letters. ..LBJ

mitchpalmer
Автор

I strongly believe that Oswald didn't fire the fatal shot.

glenncawley
Автор

Oswald was not an expert shot he was an marksman that means that he could hit a target. To be able to make the shots from the window he would have to be an expert shot. I don't care what anyone says Oswald was not the shooter.

Matt-kgge
Автор

If LHO really acted alone, you really think 4, 500 documents would still be shielded from the public?

watchman
Автор

Oswald was not on the sixth floor that day. He did not even handle a rifle that day. Kill shot came from the grassy knoll - close range, low trajectory. and dozens of witnesses confirmed this.

majorpayne
Автор

Name names who are withholding these documents . Public pressure will change their minds .

vince
Автор

Why is it so difficult to release the truth?

norton