BREAKING NEWS: Jim Jordan Almost Speechless At DOJ's Kristen Clarke's Answer About Free Speech Case

preview_player
Показать описание
At today's House Judiciary Committee hearing, Rep. Jim Jordan (R-OH) was stunned by the answer of Assistant AG Kristen Clarke, chief of the DOJ's Justice Civil Rights Division, about Missouri v. Biden.

Fuel your success with Forbes. Gain unlimited access to premium journalism, including breaking news, groundbreaking in-depth reported stories, daily digests and more. Plus, members get a front-row seat at members-only events with leading thinkers and doers, access to premium video that can help you get ahead, an ad-light experience, early access to select products including NFT drops and more:

Stay Connected
Рекомендации по теме
Комментарии
Автор

Sorry but I do not believe her that she was unaware

chrisbrimhall
Автор

Shocking doesn't begin to describe.

Burger
Автор

Can you say the words, "Affirmative Action."

michaelwilson
Автор

They should try to get access to her emails. I guarantee she has back-and-forth email conversations with people about this case. These people need to start getting called out on their nonsense and getting fired in disgrace.

jasondashney
Автор

When these people are questioned, they should be required to answer yes and no questions with a simple Yes or

lauraellen
Автор

This is a very effective tactic it seems if your party is in control. Just keep saying 'I don't know. I'm unaware. I can't answer that. I'll take the question back to my department and get you the answer.' However, the question is never answered on the record on purpose.

axepagode
Автор

Time to start hiring people in positions that need experienced instead of race and gender. America is being destroyed because of this BS.

rebg
Автор

Should have asked her if she knew where Missouri was or if she she knew who Biden was! Or if she knew what the Supreme Court does!

chasatch
Автор

It’s like doctor saying that they are not familiar with the cardiovascular system and not being liable at all for it

carleenmessina
Автор

I find it very unbelievable that this woman does not know the case he is referencing. I live under a rock and I know. She is in the heart of this admin. And trying to have us believe she doesn’t know about something of this magnitude going on. This shows how serious they are about taking an oathof truth telling and about their honesty in the overall performance of their job.

marktackett
Автор

I remember her confirmation hearing and her testimony, and I as a citizen found her answers unacceptable. She is definitely unqualified for the position she now holds.

stevenfromer
Автор

This is the result of what affirmative action in action produces which is especially unfair to this unprepared woman, Kristen Clark.

xxxxxx-tqmw
Автор

Just STUNNING.

How the hell do people like that manage to get into positions like that?

MRTOMBO
Автор

AMEN!!!! Proof the justice dept is political!!!!

Pinkrosesme
Автор

What is this woman's annual salary ?
We are paying her salary ??
And she's as smart as box of rocks..

captainmorgan
Автор

When given the choice between admitting corruption or claiming incompetence, it is almost always more beneficial to claim incompetence.

danalexander
Автор

It’s shocking that she didn’t use the “I can’t comment due to it being an ongoing investigation” excuse that Garland and Wray invoke every time they are called to testify! She needs remedial training on Congressional testimony because her bias and/or incompetence was on display. 🤬

paulshanahan
Автор

Proof they're mot doing their jobs, if she doesn't even know about this case.

nancyweber
Автор

I believe she doesn't know WTFark is going on. It's a case of willful ignorance.

ghettosapien
Автор

Not Aware, the code of this administration.

whitehaze