Section 19/19A/64 Indian contract act

[niteshgautam]

Sir thankyou soo much apki vedios college exam aur judiciary preparation me bhut help krti hai

[pinkychhaparwal]

Sir your videos are very fruitful thanks in tonnes your ways of teaching is so simple ....and accurate

[asmaulhoque]

This is very helpful video for every law students to law graduates who are practicing or preparing for any legal competitive exam. Thank you so much sir 🙏

[MamaLuchi]

good morning Sir
Way of your teaching extremely impressive.... Great fan of yours.

[sandhyakunte]

very nice video lecture sir thank you so much uploaded this video lecture.

[arpitajain]

There is no chance of any doubt after taking ur lecture

[_.Pallavi]

Thank you so much sir, your efforts are appreciable 🙏

[ushachoudhary]

Good morning sir. This video was helpful in clearing my doubts on the topic. 🌸

[siddharthkhokhar]

i got my doubts cleared . thank u very much

[noopy]

In illustration (a) of Sec '19A'...B threats A to prosecute him for the forged note..here threat of prosecuting was not false, A had really forged the prmsry note..& in Coercion topic, we learnt that threat of true prosecution is not coercion.So if we see similar situation in a question that someone is threatening the other person for the prosecution of offence that he has actually done..will it be coercion and will be voidable under 19 or will it be undue inflnce viodable under 19A or it will be no offence if we go by what we learnt in coercion topic..someone plz clarify this in depth..thank u..God bless all

[RohitKumar-bukc]

Sir please keep uploading lectures without any break.

[samarmishra]

Sir illustration e m toh Doctrine of Estoppel bhi toh lag jaaega as per section 115 of IEA as we had read case of Syed Abdul Khader vs Rami Reddy aur section 43 k according bhi TPA ke
Tog contract voidable ku hoga at the option of A

[Deepakkumar-xsot]

illustration (e) mein A bhi to check krr sakta h na ki propert uss pe aayi ya nahi, ,,wo bhi to check krr sakta h acc.to illustration B

[unknownmaninformation]

Sir ap Lafz...means use ker rheee hee iskaa matlb kiaa hee buht confuse kr rhaaa hee ye words???

[shaleendhaker]

Sir ordinary diligence ka matlab kya hota hai

[AnilKumar-pexx]

Sir ji main aapse contact kaise karoon

[surajpandey]

Sir, section 64 me kaha gya h ki, jo contract ko voidable ghoshit karwayega, agar usne koi benefit gain ki h to usse dusri party ko restore karna hoga.
Mera question ye h ki, jis party ne CUFM ka prayog kiya, agar vo koi benefit gain karta h, to kya court usse order ni degi Aggreived ko restore karne ka.
Agar degi to vo kon se section k according degi??
Please answer Sir.

[shouryagarg]

Sir also explain illustration d of section 19

[namangoyal]

Sir ek baar section 19 ki e illustration samjha do

[investology]

Sir S.64 and S.19A m likha h ki jis party k option pr contract voidable h agr usne koi benefit liya h vo restore krega.
Whether the other party commit any act mention in S.15, 16, 17, 18 get benefit under that contract is bound to restore or not?? If yes then why??
Because provision deal with person at whose option contract is voidable.
Thank you sir..