SC to hear pleas challenging abrogation of Article 370 from August 2

#Article370 | The Centre’s affidavit claiming normalcy has returned to #JammuAndKashmir will not have any bearing on the merits of the matter relating to the constitutionality of the decisions, Chief Justice Chandrachud said.

[onlinemicroteaching]

Abrogation of Article 370 is completely unfair, illegal, immoral, unjust, and unconstitutional. It's an agreement between two states, i.e., India and Kashmir, which took place in 1947 and 1950. The article was temporary till the constituent assembly of Kashmir after the formation of the constitution of Kashmir, followed by the expiry of the constituent assembly, making the article Permanent in nature in both the constitutions of Kashmir and India post-1957 onwards. Any erosion, abrogation, or amendment is totally invalid and illegal, even unconstitutional; if so, there Must be a constituent assembly. Without constituent assembly, no amendment is permissible, valid, or legit, even though there's no substitute for constituent assembly.
That is why it is a permanent feature in both the constitutions of Kashmir and India.
The relationship between India and Kashmir is quite federal.
No unilateral decision, claim, practise, bill, or resolution is valid and legit in the case of Article 370.