Angry Photographer: The ABSOLUTE & UNKNOWN SECRET of superior lenses that render a BEST IMAGE

Angry Photographer: The ABSOLUTE & UNKNOWN SECRET of superior lenses that render a BEST IMAGE

[PavirryPe]

This has to be the most criminally underrated photography channel on Youtube. Thank you so much for these videos.

[drgnfrc]

I think a full video series on this topic would definitely be worth watching.

[kauxkaux]

Hey... I want to see the 10 videos where you explain this... it is fascinating!! Like this comment if you want Ken to make that serie of videos.

[scaniatacan]

Looks like it cannot be explained any better. You should give lectures in universities :) It is nice when you use these materials like this. Without these I wouldn't understand much. Thank you for your videos. This seems to be the best in-depth explanation so far on why primes are better. I still hope I can buy one day a 24-70mm f2.8 Nikkor :) Have a nice weekend!

[fphoto]

outstanding descriptive 'explanation' ! informative and entertaining - thank you !

[GEXGE]

I laught so much I have no idea what are you talking about :)))

[MilanTermix]

You missed one major point as I have noticed on some other of your videos and that is what is the actual impact on the image itself. What do we actually gain by using 24 / 35 / 50 / 85 primes instead of a 24-70? Thanks

[mv]

This is what I had been wanting to hear for a loooong time, but no one could explain. Thank you.

[SunnyBleek]

You are truly the Albert Einstein of Photography and/or the Nutty Professor. And even though one is a fictional character. I find one highly interesting and knowledgeable, and the other very entertaining. In any case I sincerely hope you take this as a complement, and continue to share the truth.

[KingLewis]

do you have any good reference book about this specific issue? Where did you get this valuable information from?

[Combatpzman]

As a person with monocular vision this makes a lot of sense. Sucks when I shoot, because went my eyes get tired I get double vision, it's a delightful experience.

[pArTxTimxGamr]

I would watch all 10 vids I love the technical explanation and visual aids brilliant simply brilliant thxs

[MrDomq]

Bloody good video, man. Super informative, even though it is kind of foreign to someone like me, because on the science side of things I'm not the best, this video was greatly informative.

[TylerThomas]

Thank you for finally speaking on the issue plainly. You’ve hinted at this effect often and I’ve always wondered what you meant. I know you like the Tamron 100mm macro, have you tried the new Nikon 105mm Z macro? I’ve heard it seems to have a beautiful rendition, but it is also a modern lens with 16 elements in 11 groups.

[thisisnuts]

thank you. that was very cool. learn a lot.

[whichlens]

The more the light travels through one glass element the more u get phase dispertion : the more it exagerates what ur eye reads as behind and front position info in the frame... I'm not sure, but there is a notion of exageration in the 2 dimentional rendu of the frame, with such heavy, sometimes 3 elements lens... some well known old examples out there... guys with some database might remind us which ones, the Nikon 80mm 2.0 should be on the list. Look for those thick elements inside the 135mm 2.8 Meyer Optik, also quoted "Bokeh Monster" with 15 blades... Look what u see trough a "Boule de cristal", sorry "Cristal ball"... think that's it, Think our eye is a ball full of one lens and liquid : that liquid is what give us the "cristal ball" effect. Thx dear professor, another hit.

[ol_ksiy]

Hey Ken, so i got that 28-85 AF nikkor you recommended. IT's pretty good lookin, no scratches, moderate dust, minimal wear. But there's one thing that bothers me - the focusing ring is screeching real bad when i'm turning it. I mean it's REAL loud metal screeching there. The seller say's that it's fine and half of those "old era" lenses are like that. I can still return it but i want to hear your opinion on it.

[ryanburzalow]

+Theoria ApophasisThanks for going so in depth, i appreciate you actually taking the time to make something not many will watch, but those who do will learn alot from. Im going to buy my first telephoto and wonder if you would suggest the 180mm prime 2.8 or the 80-200 either push pull(what are your thouhgts on that lens), or the current 80-200 used. i shoot mostly people, my city, and nature. Would love to hear your input on which is best for what uses. Thanks.

[dongerramarco]

i am starting again with my photography
i want to work with only 4 primes i am getting the 100mm tokina atx pro any way .. l want the best 30 or 35 a 50 and something else wide (but the best for wedding) sticking with my d7000 and d7100.. give me some recommendations

[AlanKlughammer]

I think you have simplified this so much that it is almost wrong. Binocular vision has nothing to do with phase interference, but with slightly different base line views combined in our brain. Our brain also uses other clues such as relative size to interpolate distance.
After seeing your video, I think I want to play with phase difference, aka moire, to see what I can come up with. Although I am not sure if it will add the the perception of depth as you seem to insinuate.