How to Confirm If Your Gaming PC Sucks

[azzamali]

Crysis was a technical marvel and visually way ahead of the time. I don't think Starfield deserves this much praise for what it is.

[flynntaggart]

"only gamers know that joke"
jumped the whole ocean, can't even see the shark anymore

[bmxcrasher]

The physics system is tied to the frame rate. Above 60 and it goes wonky

[shobits]

Optimization takes time and money... let's skip that and force customers to pay more money instead of us (corporation mentality) 😁

[christiandk]

Im playing on a 2070 super, about 60 fps indoors and 35-45 outdoors
(This is with the dlss mod and another optimization mod installed)

[OoOthememesguy]

I hope they make an update for the game and make it optimized somehow because this is insane imagine getting Rx 6700 xt for 1440p gaming and then having to lower the settings to finally hit 60 fps in 1080p medium or low settings

[rodrigogirao]

From what I heard, Starfield is not demanding, it's just poorly optimized.

[hddbvdcx]

Ryzen 5 5600 and rx 7600, 50-60 fps Ultra settings 1080p. Im really happy with it. Also 32 gb Ram

[WCGwkf]

60-120 in 4k ultra depending on the environment. 7900xtx/12900k

[jsawyer]

I’m pretty sure I’m good. Built a 4090 with a 7800x3d. Haven’t seen any issues yet. I wanted a pc that’ll run anything even in VR.

[mrmumblz]

Without all the optimization texture mods I’m using I’d get around 40 in the cities and sometimes it dips into the 60’s in space lmao but with the mods I’m hitting 80 in cities and 100 in space I’m uising that steam deck mod on my pc and it was a massive boost bethini helps too!

[warefareoid]

My 5600XT and Ryzen 3600 are doin pretty okay, honestly. I play on medium, with lowest fps in new Atlantis around 26 (while raining) and I average around 50 in space. All things considered, chillin

[therealcrow]

I think, compared to crysis, starfield can actually be enjoyed on slower hardware. Crysis was known for not starting, not handling graphics right and insane dips in fps. Starfield makes it really hard to get 60 fps and fsr2 is basically a must for most users to get good framerates. However, even on reasonably old hardware you can still get "console level 30fps" for the most part

[LunarS]

Got a ryzen 7 5700x, 32gbs of memory, and a 6750xt. I get about 50-60fps constantly at high setting at 1080p. I haven't ran into many dips and lows YET (still in the early parts of the game, like 20 hours in goofing around lvl 16 early) but its been fun and nothing horrible yet

[CarrotKing]

I've got an rx5700xt, the game feels incredibly smooth, I get high 40s low 50s in cities.
At this point I'm starting to think that Bethesda heavily optimized the game for low end specs, and didn't do crap for high end, cause I'm getting the same performance on low settings as a 3080ti is getting on medium, and my gpu is miles behind it in terms of raw power.
Also low settings look like really good, obviously gtao is on ultra, but they makes zero performance difference.

[danmar]

Developers will never change: coding games to kill your beautiful new GPU!

[galacticcube]

20 fps normally, got the ryzen 5 5600g (integrated graphics) with no actual gpu and 32g of ram, can't afford a gpu rn or a case so it's just the motherboard sitting on top of the box connected to my powersupply 😅

[kidnamedfinger]

My PC can run even more realistic (graphic-wise) games, loading most of the maps at once (which are incredibly large).

This is not a demanding game, it is a very raw, unoptimized one.

[Lolboy]

I get around 40-60fps outside and a bit more inside. This is with a Ryzen 5 5600 and rx 5700 XT using Hardware Unboxed's performance mode optimized settings at 1080p (no upscaling)

[entertainmentsekai]

crysis is a good looking game for it time while starfield is just a game with bad optimization