Consensus Is the END of Science

preview_player
Показать описание
Sen. Rand Paul explains how the idea of consensus is fundamentally anti-science. Science is about inquiry, skepticism, and challenging the accepted wisdom of the past. Now, we have a politic apparatus that demands we all agree about science, even in cases where the results are far from clear. Instead of encouraging research that gets to the truth, dissenters are censored and shamed. That’s a path that leads to a society in which scientists are afraid to ask the important questions, innovation stagnates, and the truth gets buried under propaganda

Connect with us on Social Media:

#Kibbeonliberty #randpaul #drfauci #science #fauci #covid #thescience #covid19 #interview #debate #talk #rant #blazetv
Рекомендации по теме
Комментарии
Автор

Just like Tucker said…when’s the last time you saw a debate on anything ?

goldbud
Автор

Once you lose objective science, the world will revert to superstition, delusion, and fallacy.

craxd
Автор

Evolution was another one of the consensuses of “science”.

kb-mtvr
Автор

There has always been full consensus on every facet of "true" science. Those who don't agree must be othered, isolated from society, and possibly reeducated. Any change in the accepted dogma has to come from those in authority, and must always serve to increase their power. That's how science works.

ColeDedhand
Автор

Remember everyone. It was once the Scientific Consensus that the Earth was the Center of the Universe.

GreyWolfLeaderTW
Автор

Remember folks, if climate change was such a huge threat to our species, we would be building nuclear power plants like crazy.

Crimea_River
Автор

Amazing that Neil Degrasse Tyson went on national TV and claimed that all that mattered in science was consensus. Might be a good physicist but he’s a pretty horrible student of history.

comicsgator
Автор

Everyone wants everything for free but will then ironically wonder why no-one (outside of the 'approved' or grifting) are motivated to the 'approved' supposed 'innovators' often and primarily simply end up serving other 'approving' political/ideological interests rather than free/open innovation.

secretgoldfish
Автор

So what are we dealing with now ? Pseudologist ? Consensusologist ? Same old job with new twist.

davidrogers
Автор

Rand give Fauci a box of your famous Kentucky

jimpikoulis
Автор

Thanks for the breakdown! I have a quick question: My OKX wallet holds some USDT, and I have the seed phrase. (alarm fetch churn bridge exercise tape speak race clerk couch crater letter). Could you explain how to move them to Binance?

CrissyHellwig
visit shbcf.ru