When an F-4 Phantom Meets a Concrete Wall #shorts

preview_player
Показать описание
In 1988, Sandia National Laboratories did a unique test. Find out more, because it's #NotWhatYouThink #NWYT #shorts

Music:
Parhelia - Craft Case

Footage:
US Department of Defense

Note: "The appearance of U.S. Department of Defense (DoD) visual information does not imply or constitute DoD endorsement."
Рекомендации по теме
Комментарии
Автор

Well, on the subject of no fire or explosion, my guess would be that the F4 had no fuel in it and the rockets on the sled were powered by solid state fuel which had burned out by the time they reached the wall.

EchosTackyTiki
Автор

“So what’s the next step of your master plan?”

Wall Bane: “Crashing this plane…with no one on it.”

chakzchaks
Автор

This is what I imagine everytime someone says an unstoppable force vs an immovable object

naqi_zariz
Автор

“It’s not what you think” no it’s exactly what everyone thought lol

maxhalverson
Автор

The wings passed by the wall like: "sike you thought"

JR-hszd
Автор

I wish you can be posting 3times a day, I'm really learning a lot

icekidtvshorts
Автор

"This, is not what you think"

Me (who doesn't think of anything): 😒

joshuarodel
Автор

Respect the brave driver willing to do the test when no one else would

dad
Автор

"My old man has awesome set of tools. I can fix that F-4 Phantom."

chasing_dragons
Автор

However, 2 planes brought down 3 buildings on a day when some people did something 🤔

moefritz
Автор

I don't mean to trivialize delicate subject matter by saying this: They were ahead of the curve considering 9/11. It's good to know you can't just compromise a nuclear reactor by crashing a plane into it.

killian
Автор

I have a feeling that the creator is telling me that 9/11 was an inside job

samurai
Автор

Every time he says that its not what i think. It turns out to be exactly what i thought.

chrissinatra
Автор

We expected to see some tell tale out-blast when the jet hit the tower in New York. Evidently the entrained wind was of greater magnitude than the reaction of the facia of the building. Still, it was peculiar in comparison with modeling.

rogerscottcathey
Автор

I love how he specified that the wall was the test subject 🤣🤣 I'm going to laugh myself into an early grave. F.H 🤣 (nothing but love)

alokk
Автор

“Notice how there’s no explosion on impact” maybe because there’s nothing that CAN explode? Why else would you need a rocket sled if there was a perfectly fueled up engine in that thing that will obscure your view of the impact of it creates a fireball?

kolinmartz
Автор

Really like your channel. If we had more like them we would all be a bit smarter.

Paulhutch
Автор

When an unstoppable plane meets an unbreakable concrete wall

mrchief
Автор

"There it is. There it is! *MEGA Ass ripping* "
Also, I like how he casually hits me with 9 /11 flashbacks...

paytontso
Автор

Actually I live next to a Nuclear Reactor and they have a kids center to go and learn at. They have this video running and have a plaque talking about the test and how the concrete wall can withstand such a test. So it's interesting to have already seen this before.

danielbrendemuehl
welcome to shbcf.ru