What are Protasis and Apodosis? (90 Second Philosophy)

A quick explanation of Protasis, Apodosis, Antecedent, and Consequent, and how they are used in philosophical discourse.

Sponsors: João Costa Neto, Dakota Jones, Thorin Isaiah Malmgren, Prince Otchere, Mike Samuel, Daniel Helland, Mohammad Azmi Banibaker, Dennis Sexton, Yu Saburi, Mauricino Andrade, Will Roberts, Greg Gauthier, Christian Bay, Joao Sa, Richard Seaton, Edward Jacobson, isenshi, and √2. Thanks for your support!

Information for this video gathered from The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, The Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophy, The Cambridge Dictionary of Philosophy, The Oxford Dictionary of Philosophy and more!

[TheRealisticNihilist]

You should have said,

"If this is a protasis, then this is an apodosis"

[navis]

I can do this in 3 seconds: "if p (protasis) then q (apodosis)." Protosis (what comes before, "pro"); apodosis (what comes after, "apo").

[lt]

What is the Aristotelian / Greek word, that has the end -sis, for “hypothesis-testing”?

[CAndiron]

Indexical and deictic. Or maybe that's more linguistic than philosophical? I don't know.

[cristian_]

I'm watching this is understand scholastic exegesis.

[CAndiron]

What about sense/reference, intensional/extensional? That seems almost synonymous.

[picaweltschmerz]

"Objectivism" and "Derivative Schlock" can be substituted with little meaning lost and all syllabic content retained.

(drops mic)