Common Ancestry

Don't forget to Like, Comment, Subscribe and Share for more content inshaAllah.

[jh]

All the atheists are devolving into apes and going bananas at what he said 😂😂

[justtostudylol]

Suboor i just want to say . The amount of hate you get and you are doing this thing is truly amazing. Brother i love your vids . Don't stop making them . Hope i can meet you someday and ignore these hates they have doing these to every messenger of Allah. Hope you have a good life brother ❤

[bluelightmoon]

I recommend reading darwinian fairytales

[matti]

What on earth does this prove? - that genetic material can be transferred in ways other than passing on genes to offspring. It’s still science big man. Bear in mind I am not an atheist - how could I know if there is a god or not. However, I base my beliefs on what I deem the most proved theories - don’t disregard peer-reviewed science, faith and science can coexist

[fahim]

When he talks about darwinian theory, he is excluding the updates and new findings

[ClipsProvider]

Read this for 2 billion good deeds 'Allahummaghfir lil muslimina wal muslimat, wal mu'minina wal mu'minat
(x by 70 during Ramadan, so 140 billion)

[curiousman]

You noted a very rare occurrence. You still aren't debunking the main argument that we all share a common ancestor with other animals 😂.

[PV]

Little does he know transposons, horizontal gene transfer, etc... came from a common ancestor as well :)))

Small add-on: 25% of genes are similar between snakes & cows, but within that 25% there is a minimal percentage that is present in both species due to gene transfer. Everything else was from common ancestry.

[sjl]

As an evolutionary biologist I’m dismayed that someone can be so arrogant based on misunderstanding. Even if there’s 25% genetic identity between snakes and cows, that doesn’t mean anything like that 25% of the genes are the same. Put roughly it’s more like that across the genetic regions compared (the DNA sequences, made of four molecules abbreviated A, C, G or T) there is on average about 25% of those being the same one molecule type (ACG or T) at each position being compared. For example with sequences AAAA versus CCCA, each both having an A at the fourth place (ie 25% of the four characters are the same state), or same with GTGA versus CCCA. Regardless of average genetic similarity overall, each and every gene or genetic region being compared is almost certain to have some difference in genetic sequence between the two animals, with most sequences having many genetic differences. But many people totally misunderstand such numbers as being that 25% of genes are exactly the same - which i expect led him to the absurd line “25% from cow to snake”, yet it’s nothing of the sort. It’s actually that several of the shared genes will have higher average percentage similarity, but many less. Such simplistic summary statistics are really a dire representation of the genetic material, rather stupidly maybe like saying that 25% of cars in two rows of traffic are same, but only counting them when same colour is paired up next against each other, such summary numbers are of really limited use. Such simple statistics from genetic material also greatly depend on what subset of the overall genetic material is being counted. There’s always lots of variable regions where difference is so much between any two species that trying to compare aspects would be absurd, and such that usually excluded from such general ‘similarity’ numbers. Without him defining what fraction or aspects of overall genetic material (genome) his “25%” is based on, i’m challenged to explain how to interpret the number, but then claims high similarity is by “jumping genes” it’s clear he has zero understanding of how genetic studies come up with such numbers and more importantly why. 😢😂

[dilldathrill]

Finally he got something right, although that hasn’t just been discovered as he said. Barbara McClintock discovers that genes can jump around on chromosomes all the way back in 1944.

[TheAcidicMolotov]

We follow some science when it comes to disproving atheists on certain things, but once they get to the parts that you use God to describe you cant handle it

[universe]

What a naive ....transposons and horizontal gene transfer is one way that evolution works And this budy right here comes and uses it as an argument against evolution😂

[bkbstbmanoery]

With all due respect! There is only one God therefore we all created from the same Dust

[joan]

Instead of preaching on the street, present your findings to sceience journals or Oxford University. You are guaranteed a novel prize.

[sameersam]

He is a follower of science but he can't hold truth😂😂😂

[adhiezulfikar]

Using science to disapprove science … hmmm don’t understand his logic 🤣

[Dsmantle]

All these different theories of evolutions just prove the fact science is just speculative. It doesn't seem to have a definite explanation to how creation came to be. Hell, there is even one that postulates that Humans came from a single person, that sounds awfully a lot like what theists already know

[avadhootv]

Barbara Mcclintock turned in her grave.

[Maniyanthra]

Man this guy needs to calm down and introspect. Debate scientist and refute scientific studies. Prove unequivocally what he is shouting is true. But the dude just want a few likes and the approval of other ignorant ppl by shouting nonsense.

[dankenschmit]

Subhoor learnt a new word and started his usual idocracy with it 😂

Here's it because I'm concerned about the misinformation

Jumping genes, also known as transposable elements, are DNA sequences that have the ability to move around within a genome. They can insert themselves into new locations in the DNA, sometimes causing mutations or changing gene expression. Jumping genes are found in most organisms, from bacteria to humans, and can have both positive and negative effects on the genome. Scientists can use the presence and location of jumping genes to study the evolutionary relationships among different species.

In snakes, jumping genes have been used to study their evolutionary relationships and divergence times. For example, a study published in the journal "Genome Biology and Evolution" in 2015 used jumping genes to investigate the relationships among various snake species. The researchers found evidence that some jumping genes were present in all snake species studied, suggesting that they were present in the common ancestor of all snakes. They also found that some jumping genes were specific to certain snake groups, indicating that those groups diverged from each other more recently.

jumping genes do not contradict the concept of common ancestry. In fact, jumping genes can provide evidence for common ancestry by revealing similarities and differences in the presence and location of these DNA sequences among different species.

Jumping genes are inherited from ancestors and can persist in a genome over time, providing a molecular record of evolutionary history. Scientists can compare the presence and location of jumping genes in different species to infer their evolutionary relationships and common ancestry. For example, if two species share the same jumping gene in the same location in their genome, it is likely that they inherited that gene from a common ancestor.