[Jazz Amp Comparison]UAFX Dream '65 vs Henriksen Blu 6

[Jazz Amp Comparison]
Universal AudioUAFX Dream '65 vs Henriksen Blu 6

Speak Low - Kurt Weill

Guitar : Gibson ES-175 (1979)
Pick : Dunlop Jazz III
Strings : Ernie Ball 13-17-24-34-44-54

Interface : RME Fireface UC
DAW : Logic Pro 9

00:00 Dream
00:32 Henriksen
00:54 Dream
02:41 Henriksen

[picker]

Wonderful comparison. They both sound great with your playing. Thanks.

[zimmy]

I almost don't even care what you're comparing. Just love your playing!

[czemplikmusic]

Thanks for comparition, I have UAFX Dream and I want to buy Blu 6, so that's very interestning test for me. Dream is little more comprised in that movie, but both sound good. It's not possibile to show in movie but for me biggest difference is in feeling during playing. Dream 65 has that very short latency which makes you feel like when you play on digital effect. That's why I want to buy Henriksen as true analog amp and preamp. For simulating I consider to buy buy Humbold Simplifier X, which is also full analog.

[leventopoulos]

Nice playing! The Dream also sounds glorious used as a preamp going into the Henriksen!

[BucoBucolini]

This stompbox sounds incredibly good. I noticed several other amp comparisons videos on your channel and they all sound good but this Dream box has warmth the others don't, and the tone is so full. I'm particularly impressed with the speaker emulation, you really get a sense that the signal is going through the actual speaker cabinet. It really is a jazzbox dream tone with that 175. Super playing too.

[paulgibby]

Nice playing. Hard to tell the sound differences on YouTube, but I had a feeling the UAFX was a bit warmer, with more saturation (harmonics). Both sounded good though.

[HatefYaminiOnline]

Beautifully played as always. What speaker do you use with the Dream?

[smarfmart]

What do you hear when using DI with the UAFX? Is it connected to any speakers or monitors, or do you just hear the guitar unplugged?