Do the potential Raheem Sterling & Jadon Sancho deals make sense for both clubs?

With Chelsea & Manchester both open to deals that would see Raheem Sterling in Manchester & Jadon Sancho at Stamford Bridge, the good morning transfer team discuss whether or not these deals would benefit both parties.

#SkySportsNews #SkySports #chelsea #manchesterunited

 
More from Sky Sports on YouTube:

[MrDeepCurry]

I'm getting a Alexis Sanchez <> Henrikh Mkhitaryan vibe from this for some reason

[TheMid-lifeGamer]

The idea that United is considering this is appalling. I hope it's just a tactic to prompt Juventus to make a move for Sancho. Sterling ex Man City and Liverpool, should be questioned for his loyalty? Utd need to dodge these players, Sancho has potential for the future at least.

[hurrayforanonyms]

The only people this transfer makes sense to are Sky Sports pundits. And club accountants wanting to kick the PSR can down the road.

[KaElWahel]

Both players are not needed in both clubs

[charlesapana]

That would be nice move for both parties

[aarondammi]

Manchester united should stay away from this deal.. united do not need sterling.

[arjxn]

What’s the point of swap deal when we have to many wingers

[davidpearson]

No they make no sense whatsoever, sterling looks well over the hill even at 29 and hes olayed for Liverpool and city its like the biggest no possible

[emmanuelagolom]

Makes sens only for Man U to be honest.
What’s wrong with Sancho? Can’t he just stay in Dortmund?

[T]

Nothing about any of this deal makes sense 😂

[UnrulyRebel-hdpl]

Sterling going to United would be criminal

[martinalbert]

No because sterling wont start then he will just complain like Sancho did. You are just replacing a problem for a problem but United will save in monthly salary coz Sancho making 350, 000 a week.

[ShoutItWout]

Utter nonsense from these lads and Deeney, this deal makes no sense for United whatsoever. Sterling is 5 years older than Sancho, is on 50k more per week and hasn’t been even half decent since he left City. Sure United want Sancho out but a swap, especially this one, would be absolutely ridiculous

[steveworrell]

Competing with Nani Madookay is a terrifying prospect

[drumandbasslocal]

I really hope Chelsea don’t bring in Sancho he won’t be a starter and that will bring out the Sancho that Manchester United are desperate to get rid of

[bangbangfrancis]

I'm a Manchester United fan. Keep Raheem Stalin Thousands of miles away from my club And I would say the same thing for any Liverpool player of that.

[anthonybariek]

Makes absolutely no sense for either. Chelsea don’t need Sancho and United don’t need Sterling. It especially makes no sense for United to take a player 5 years older in a position that they’re already full in. Ben Chilwell would be better suited for Uniteds needs but his injury record makes that a non-starter

[Skizzores]

It’s amazing that Chelsea have swapped Sterling for Sancho. Sterling has the application, the drive and experience. Sancho cannot produce when required, a bad trainer and nose dived at every English club he’s been at because of a bad attitude. It’s all amazing to me!

[Emb]

Chelsea need a strong defense, they should just sell sterling. They have felix, neto, mudryk, madueke, Palmer and possibly now oshimen. They don't need sancho, what they need is a world class goal keeper.

[Graphicslibra]

We don't need sterling if Sancho has to leave it has to be pure profit not swap deals