Kingston KC3000, 980 PRO GG

preview_player
Показать описание
Maybe not be the best in all categories but the Samsung 980 PRO finally has some worthy opposition. Worthy enough that I'll consider KC3000 my next primary drive in a workhorse. For some reason Samsung videos have hi ROF vs. the others. I don't believe that it's a pure user curiosity. Something is fishy. And it's not a Kingston.

►TIMESTAMPS
00:00 Hot throne
00:03 Specs
00:19 RND4K Q1T1 (we need this)
00:43 RND4K Q32T16 (servers need this)
01:00 SEQ1M Q8T1 (video editors need this)
01:12 Game loading times (gamers)
01:23 Usage vs. performance (fill it up)
01:46 M.2 X570 speed (AMD)
02:06 AJA continuous write (burnout without a white smoke)
02:49 Conclusion (yup, it's good)

Comparison is done with a Gen 4.0 drives:
- Kingston KC3000,
- Samsung 980 PRO,
- Wester Digital SN850,
and two Gen 3.0 drives:
- Samsung SSD 980,
- Samsung 970 Evo Plus.

All tested models are 500GB size to have a meaningful comparison with previous test.
#Kingston #KC3000 #SKC3000S/512G
Рекомендации по теме
Комментарии
Автор

Nice test. I seems that 980 Pro is best choice for me. Liked 90% fill test, as it is most common scenario for my usage.

westsidepimping
Автор

Thank you by the way. You channel will be my go to when I buy new nvme ssd.

Can you please also try pcie slot adapter. Will it be better?

markpelayo
Автор

What exactly is "ROF" that you mention in video description? Sounds like rate of failure, but you are referring to samsung video and not the drive itself.

mlnchee
Автор

Hi is it always better to get 1tb nvme or 500gb should be fine? Is 1tb faster?

markpelayo
visit shbcf.ru