These Are Trump's Likely Debate Attacks On Kamala Harris Tomorrow Night: Political Scientist

On "Forbes Newsroom," political scientist Charles Lipson gave his take on the upcoming presidential debate with former President Trump and Vice President Kamala Harris, what the moderators must ask, the state of the 2024 presidential contest, and more.

Fuel your success with Forbes. Gain unlimited access to premium journalism, including breaking news, groundbreaking in-depth reported stories, daily digests and more. Plus, members get a front-row seat at members-only events with leading thinkers and doers, access to premium video that can help you get ahead, an ad-light experience, early access to select products including NFT drops and more:

Stay Connected

[JD-ulzj]

Surprised she doesn't have covid yet

[rosepink]

We need to ask her what did she do in the White House with Biden, why doesn’t she help country in this time with disaster….Omg, nobody wants to see another 4 yrs disaster or WWIII ????

[genebaughbba]

The Chennys would not be an endorsement that Donald Trump would want.

[akasonmusice_]

Vote Trump2024 for another round of global peace ✌️

[bryanprice]

How do you convince people you havent changed policies when you track record is to habitually change policy??

[dcanada]

Open your eyes
Kamala will get the questions and answers before hand, just like when Hilary Clinton debated Burnie Sanders.

[casuallevelexpert]

This headline as is, just 🙄 wow. How biased can media possibly be. Trump is going to “attack” her? Seriously? What happened to toning down the rhetoric? You remember he was the one who actually got shot, right? Good grief

[hard-at-work]

FOX & FORBES FINANCIALLY BACKED BY AUSTRALIA ! !
SUPPORT TRUMP AS SUPREME AUSTRALIAN LEADER FOREVER
🎯🎯🎯🎯🎯🎯🎯🎯

[GKWALKER]

DEMOCRAT PARTY’S TRUE COLORS
This is the Inconvenient Truth about the Democrat Party--
When you think about racial equality and civil rights, which political party comes to mind? The Republicans or the Democrats. Most people would probably say the Democrats, but this answer is incorrect.
Since its founding in 1829, the Democrat Party has fought against every major civil rights initiative and has a long history of discrimination. That is correct; the Democrat Party defended slavery, started the Civil War, opposed Reconstruction, founded the Ku Klux Klan, imposed segregation, perpetrated lynchings, and fought against the Civil Rights Acts of the 1950s and 1960s.
***
In contrast, the Republican Party was founded in 1854, as an Anti-Slavery Party. Its mission was to stop the spread of slavery into the new western territories, with the aim of abolishing it entirely.
***
This effort however was dealt a major blow by the Supreme Court in the 1857 case Dread Scott versus Sandford. The Supreme Court ruled that slaves were citizens and not property. The seven justices who voted in favor of slavery were all Democrats. The two justices who dissented were both Republicans.
The slavery question was of course ultimately resolved by a bloody Civil
War. The Commander-in-Chief during that war was the first Republican President, Abraham Lincoln. This Republican President who freed the slaves 6 days after the Confederate army surrendered, was assassinated by John Wilks Booth-- a Democrat.
President Lincoln's Vice President, a Democrat named Andrew Johnson, assumed the Presidency but Johnson adamantly opposed Lincoln's plan to integrate the newly freed slaves into the South's economic and social order.
Johnson and the Democrat Party were unified in their opposition to the 13th Amendment which abolished slavery, the 14th Amendment which gave former African slaves citizenship, and the 15th Amendment, which gave African Americans the right to vote. All three passed only because

[DH-tjtf]

Kamala bring Air Freshener it's said trump smells like a lake shore Out House ❗😅

[drakewoods]

This guy is brilliant. I'm really glad l stumbled onto this interview.

[Samk]

Ms. Nikki Haley's criticism of Mr. Vance and President Trump is counterproductive and also unfounded.
I recommend that Mr. Vance defend himself against the allegations regarding his statements about childless women. In my opinion, Mr. Vance and President Trump need to tie this whole thing to Ms. Harris's judicial policy past as California's attorney general. This could explain to citizens what Mr. Vance meant by his statement. Ms. Harris separated families who were already in social difficulty and placed them in great difficulty. She sent the parents of truant students to prison. Ms. Kamala Harris showed no compassion for these families and plunged them into even greater problems. This contradicts American liberalism and the right of American families to protection. Even the University of Pennsylvania is said to have called Ms. Kamala Harris untrustworthy when she apologized for her serious mistakes. Mr. Trump, or Mr. Vance must make this public immediately and speak to the victims of the Harris justice policies in California

[Querencia]

And…..? What are hers? Why so one-sided?

[HeresJohnny-bu]

I'm not going to watch the political debate tomorrow on television. I'm going to watch a rerun of Pee Wee's Playhouse. It's a lot more interesting and makes a lot more sense. LOL

[delenabrown]

REMEMBER: 4 years ago, COVID-19 was running

[Dainiuska]

Ofcourse he should people should know what shes about scamala 😂

[leelandwilson]

They should have a real debate like they have in the past years.
This seems set up from both sides

[steveyi]

I think its just one attack. BIDEN HARRIS need to "turn the page" but who the hell is actually in office?

[sumguy]

What we really need is a government program to get some better laptops to these experts (sarcasm). Fr tho, it’s every time

[seanthomas]

PROTECT OUR GREAT NATION AND VOTE BLUE ( if you bots can vote at all, lol)