Fixing AES-256 Encryption Discrepancies Between JavaScript and PHP

Discover how to resolve unexpected values in AES-256 encryption when using JavaScript and PHP, with two essential modifications to your CryptoJS code.
---

Visit these links for original content and any more details, such as alternate solutions, latest updates/developments on topic, comments, revision history etc. For example, the original title of the Question was: Implemented AES 256 with unexpected value

If anything seems off to you, please feel free to write me at vlogize [AT] gmail [DOT] com.
---
Fixing AES-256 Encryption Discrepancies Between JavaScript and PHP

When dealing with encryption in web applications, the need for secure data transmission is paramount. Often, developers lean towards standards like the Advanced Encryption Standard (AES) for encrypting sensitive data. However, discrepancies between implementations can lead to unexpected values, especially when using different programming languages. In this post, we’ll delve into a specific problem: implementing AES-256 encryption in both JavaScript and PHP, and how to resolve the unexpected values that arise due to minor coding mistakes.

The Problem

You may find yourself trying to implement AES-256 encryption in JavaScript using the CryptoJS library and expect to achieve the same encrypted result as with a PHP implementation. For instance, consider the following JavaScript snippet using CryptoJS:

[[See Video to Reveal this Text or Code Snippet]]

However, if your result differs from what you get from the corresponding PHP code, you might encounter issues such as:

Inconsistent string length: The result lengths differ.

Incorrect ciphertext output: The actual encrypted value is wrong, leading to failures in decryption.

The Solution

Upon reviewing the issue, it turns out that two main problems exist within the CryptoJS code implementation. Let’s break these down into actionable items:

1. Disabling Default Padding

By default, CryptoJS utilizes PKCS7 padding with a block size of 16 bytes. Since the implementation is using a custom padding method with a block size of 32 bytes in the addpadding function, you must explicitly disable the default padding. Change your code to the following:

[[See Video to Reveal this Text or Code Snippet]]

This adjustment ensures that CryptoJS no longer applies its default padding method and allows your custom padding to take precedence.

2. Output Format of the Ciphertext

CryptoJS encrypts data in Base64 encoding by default. However, in your PHP implementation, the expected output format is hexadecimal. To rectify this, modify your JavaScript code to convert the ciphertext to hex before returning it:

[[See Video to Reveal this Text or Code Snippet]]

By implementing this change, you not only align the output format between PHP and JavaScript but also ensure that the encryption process remains consistent.

3. Complete Updated JavaScript Code

Integrating these revisions, your JavaScript code for AES-256 encryption should look like this:

[[See Video to Reveal this Text or Code Snippet]]

Additional Notes

It is important to mention that using a static Initialization Vector (IV), as illustrated in the example, is not secure. For production-ready code, IVs should be randomly generated for each encryption operation. Additionally, using a hardcoded key can make your encryption vulnerable. Instead, consider using a secure key derivation function for generating your encryption key.

Conclusion

By addressing two minor bugs related to padding and output encoding, you can synchronize the AES-256 encryption results between JavaScript and PHP. Such adjustments ensure that your applications maintain data integrity and security during transmission. If you face unexpected values in encryption, review the padding and encoding settings first!

Happy coding!