Will We Ever Finish the Periodic Table?

preview_player
Показать описание
Currently, there are 118 elements on the periodic table—you'd think we'd be done adding them by now, but turns out we may never be! Join Michael Aranda and learn about the newest elements and what might be the next one in this fun episode of SciShow!

----------
----------
Dooblydoo thanks go to the following Patreon supporters -- we couldn't make SciShow without them! Shout out to Patrick Merrithew, Will and Sonja Marple, Thomas J., Kevin Bealer, Chris Peters, charles george, Kathy & Tim Philip, Tim Curwick, Bader AlGhamdi, Justin Lentz, Patrick D. Ashmore, Mark Terrio-Cameron, Benny, Fatima Iqbal, Accalia Elementia, Kyle Anderson, and Philippe von Bergen.
----------
----------
Looking for SciShow elsewhere on the internet?
----------
Sources:

Image Sources:
Рекомендации по теме
Комментарии
Автор

Limit of 256? It's time to upgrade to 16-bit then!

Maddin
Автор

I love the bit about how the element Feynman predicted couldn’t exist is going to be Feynmanium, because if you read his book, that totally matches his sense of humor.

anniejones
Автор

I like this SciShow host: he's clear, has good presentation skills and seems sincerely interested in popularizing scientific knowledge. Give this man a raise!

Sherko
Автор

I'm hoping element 126 (or thereabouts) is stable and useful. It would be so cool if we could make new materials that existed literally only on Earth -- and nowhere else in the known Universe!

Generalth
Автор

I was never good at memorizing the table in high school chemistry. I suddenly all these years later had a fascination with the possibility of new elements and how they would come to be. Really amazing stuff.

oAirehko
Автор

Feynman would definitely have had a good sense of humor about 137 if that was the case.

G_Rad_Ski
Автор

Atomic weight of 256 seems like an initial "practical" upper bound to the Periodic Table. That's right around Einstenium and Fermium, which were the heaviest elements to be made in macroscopic quantities. Until we figure out how to make and stabilize more proportionately neutron-rich element synthesis, heavier elements will continue to be produced in quantities which are too small to be practical for all but the most basic chemical and physical research.

LucarioBoricua
Автор

Feynman is never wrong!
jks he's been wrong plenty of times but is still god
ps. he'd love having an element named after him no matter the circumstance

upandatom
Автор

I wanted to tell you a joke about the elements but all the good ones Argon

pnkflyd
Автор

0:25 Elliot Quincy Adams? More like Elliot Quincy ATOMS

Sheldonman
Автор

I understand Feynman's point about electrons theoretically moving faster than the speed of light, but electrons don't "orbit" in the classic, Newtonian sense of the word. I'm sure Feynman accounted for that, but can someone offer an explanation on why that is still a limit?

percyveler
Автор

Just stop researching till I complete my degree xD

sharkaboi
Автор

Shouldn't element 138 be called Feynmanium, not 137? THAT would be a good joke.

ucasvb
Автор

256 ? That gotta be some kind of optimisation feature hard coded in the universe's code ! (just kiding, I hope)

IxousLouis
Автор

Since everyone else is making chemistry jokes...


Two chemists walk into a bar. The first chemist says, "I'll have some H2O." The second chemist says, "I'll have some H2O, too." The second chemist dies.

fatterhorner
Автор

About the island of stability around 122. this might be the point at which we can use those elements to create newer ones

Near_Void
Автор

This may sound stupid, but how did people know an atom's atomic weight if they didn't know what protons were?

allenm
Автор

Great, but when are we going to create Australium.

Crafterrian
Автор

Oh, just name it Feynmanium. Knowing his reputation, he would just chuckled.

boulderbash
Автор

I used to tell chemistry jokes until I got no reaction out of it.

WalkingL
join shbcf.ru