Jim Jordan And Stacey Plaskett Have Dramatic Clash Over Her Questioning Of Taibbi, Shellenberger

preview_player
Показать описание
At today's House Weaponization of the Federal Government hearing, Del. Stacey Plaskett (D-VI) questioned Matt Taibbi and Michael Shellenberger about the Twitter Files.

Fuel your success with Forbes. Gain unlimited access to premium journalism, including breaking news, groundbreaking in-depth reported stories, daily digests and more. Plus, members get a front-row seat at members-only events with leading thinkers and doers, access to premium video that can help you get ahead, an ad-light experience, early access to select products including NFT drops and more:

Stay Connected
Рекомендации по теме
Комментарии
Автор

"I asked who gave you the files. I did not ask for your sources." This woman would argue rain wasn't water.

martinroberts
Автор

She literally asked him who gave him the files....and then said she didnt? What am i missing?

seancarristhebest
Автор

Props to the witnesses for being fully prepared to be treated like dirt. It's not easy to sit calmly while being abused, insulted and bullied, no matter how confident you are in the justness of your cause. And they're treating journalists like this! This is the most powerful testimony we've heard lately. No surprise they're acting like cornered animals.

amarissimus
Автор

The irony of Matt Taibbi being called a "so-called journalist" by a "so-called" congresswoman did not escape me.

steelcitytbirds
Автор

She's just pissed because they are busted!

jaynepetersen
Автор

If the amount of contempt in this woman's heart does not scare you, you are asleep.
she would happily jail both of these journalist

MC_heart
Автор

She’s fishing for names so they can assassinate even more character. She failed.

JHank-ybjv
Автор

You can tell she never let's anyone ever correct her. I feel sorry for those who have to live with her.

sketchartist
Автор

These people are witnesses, NOT defendants!! WTH??

joannegreenwood
Автор

Notice how when she gets interrupted she stops you right then. But she is proud to interrupt others and continue to talk over them

ricksta
Автор

You can tell who has never been smacked in the mouth for being disrespectful.

ControlledchaosE
Автор

She asks who gave you the files, then in the next breath says, I NEVER ASKED FOR HIS SOURCES. What a liar

jimmyfranks
Автор

I'm pretty sure I've seen a clip of her looting a store during the BLM riots.

Generative_Midi_
Автор

She most definitely was trying to get Matt to name his sources, when he used one of the oldest journalistic tricks in the book, she realized it would never happen. Good on Jim Jordan for catching her real time.

toysoldier
Автор

Thank GOD, for these men standing for the truth!

donthephoneman
Автор

The light of truth is shining on all the roaches

NetworksCoach
Автор

i love the fact this lady did not make any relevant points but acts like everything she said was important and relevant. straight out of kalama word salad 2.0

jonny-on-the-spot
Автор

The "honorable member" should be aware that cutting of witness statements when they clearly want to say more to clarify their statements, does not make you look assertive or in control, it makes you look afraid of what they might say and it implies you're afraid others might hear.

snakedogman
Автор

The truth needs to be shown to everyone... Facts need to be known to everyone so people can make informative decisions when it's time to vote...

larryjistel
Автор

"Who gave you access to these emails?" 3.5 minutes later "I NEVER ASKED FOR HIS SOURCES!" wow....

TurdFrguson