RX 8800 AND 8600 GPUs CONFIRMED!

preview_player
Показать описание

AMD just confirmed their RX 8000 GPU series, Nvidia's crushing it, Intel announced their Battlemage GPUs and game requirements are getting out of hand! Stay tuned...

****Items featured in this video available here****

SOURCES:

TIMESTAMPS
0:00 Game Requirements Are Getting Bad
2:32 Intel Announced Battlemage
7:54 Nvidia's Crushing It
8:48 RX 8000 Confirmed
Рекомендации по теме
Комментарии
Автор

Not interested in fake frame and upscaling to play games while the GPUs cost enough to make one believe that its powerful enough to run it native.

balthorpayne
Автор

Requiring an over 1000 dollar GPU with upscaling and frame gen turned on to get 4K 60fps is insanity

ThreaT
Автор

Rx 8800 is smart move. But most important is keep the price much lower than 4080

Peter-wueh
Автор

Stop buying unoptimized games even if you have the hardware to run them

snitch
Автор

I wonder how you talk personally. Thank you for the update

MichaelAcurantes
Автор

People act like needing a 4090 and upscaling/fg to hit 60 fps is new, a 4090 can't do native PT at 4k in any game(see AW2 and CP2077).

TakaChan
Автор

8600 getting rocm is massive. People don't understand how many people first experience nvidia because of cuda workloads and just trust the brand they have experience with. A low end card getting rocm support is massive, up until now the cheapest supported rocm card was the GRE

mmhoss
Автор

Something tells me that the game is going to be mid at best

jackkunasaki
Автор

Correction: The B580 has more performance per dollar. The graph does not indicate that the B580 is 32% faster. The graph says the Arc card offers more performance per dollar, not faster performance.

dontsupportrats
Автор

Indiana jones does not look that good to justify those requirements

NikolaiAbildgaard
Автор

Games that are not playable with normal hardware? That takes me back 😊 Who remembers Crysis?

woedendstewadpier
Автор

Honestly, I dont feel as if an SSD or 32gb of ram is unfair to ask at this point. A 2TB NVME is like 160 and 32gb of DDR5 ram is 100 for a decent brand. Its not out of reach or ludicrous in any way. It just stops masochists from getting off.

jakobinboden
Автор

the Chart @ 6:42 is QUITE MISLEADING... the New Intel card is NOT 32% faster RASTER than the 4060 and 25% faster RAT TRACING than the this chart is PERFORMANCE PER DOLLAR!!! - so Intel's Raster Performace is a 32% better VALUE than 4060 and 25% better RAY TRACING VALUE than the 4060... VERY VERY MISLEADING!

Nobe_Oddy
Автор

This is ridiculous.. the amount of unoptimized games rolling out is absolutely insane. Like STUPID RIDICULOUS.

louiienation
Автор

RX 8600 + R5 9600X looks like a great combo for a $1000 PC build

RobloxianX
Автор

Best in Class Perf / $ That is NOT better raster performance. It is a cheaper price tag that is 32% less than the competition in raster, etc. . please don't confuse the marketing with performance. That slide doesn't compare performance, it compares prices.

robertthompson
Автор

0:39 give the mod community 3 days to develop a "no ray tracing" mod :)

ShaunaJagan
Автор

B580 is not 25-32% better in tray tracing and raster performance than rtx 4060 but it's price to performance in dollar is. Compared to 4060 is about 10% better as per the slides. It's even written on slides. But how can you read both the slides and believe both different performance claims to be true as it contradicts each other.

shoaibha
Автор

i don't think asking for a budget almost 6 year old 2060 as min spec is out of hand for a next gen graphics game but yes they probably could work on optimization more

steveo
Автор

at 6:58 it per dollars no the global perf, this is very misleading

termitori