Tom Campbell: Marseilles Workshop Sunday Pt 4

The Marseilles workshop delivers the most current collective information of Tom Campbell's MBT theory. The workshop has two introductory parts and is followed by the Friday (5 parts), Saturday (4 parts), and Sunday (4 parts) presentations.

Thank you to Franck and his team in Marseilles for bringing us this superbly edited workshop of Tom Campbell's presentation of Physics, Metaphysics, and the Fundamentals of Reality in Marseilles, France, in May 2015.



Tom Campbell’s last in person event by MBT Events will be held in Spain in 2025! See our future events page!

* Tom's Audio Products are managed by Lightning Strike books in the MBT Soundwise Store.

*The reference to healing in this video and in links or programs, if any refers to consciousness exercises, and is not meant to diagnose, treat, prevent, or cure and disease. Please seek professional medical advice for all physical and mental conditions.

[kicksnarehat]

It's all data > our avatars (bodies) are data > some of the data is consciousness with intent (you) > Changing future probability (healing, "remote" viewing) is done with intent from the being level > Controlling our avatar (moving our body) is done with intent from the being level > switching data streams (going "OBE" to different reality frames) is done with the same kind of data as moving our "body". Correct? What this means is the way we, as data, effect data is the same no matter if its typing this out with my current avatar or going "obe" where I can manifest vanilla ice cream in my hand. The best description I've seen of being level that you've said is-- if you see an older lady crossing the street and you just automatically help her-that's being level-if you evaluate whether or not you should help her-that's intellect- that's a feeling I can recall and apply in evolving. Would you say that to heal something, you need the same sincerity of intent (want, focus, desire) as you have when you move your avatar?

[sngscratcher]

Hey, Tom. There is a series on YouTube where they ask different people" Why is there something rather than nothing?" Care to take a crack at it?

[jeremyyarbro]

Oh and I think the best criticism of MWI is not that it is brute force or unparsimonious. Really it comes down to some people believing that the wave function is a real thing rather than an equation, and so beginning with that belief they figure that many worlds are "logically derived". Since wave functions are not real, the premise of MWI is wrong, therefore its conclusions have no logical backing.

[joonassildre]

If the free will unit comes back as his own son, is he living through the incarnation without the free will? I got confused, because as I understand, the time is fundamental and database of events and learning experiences has been accumulated by the end of fathers life. (Or is the father having just a view of others perspective in so-called life review?)

[sngscratcher]

Hey, Tom. I find it interesting that both the materialists and the non-dualists believe that the self is an illusion, but for very different (and obvious) reasons. Do you have anything to say about this unusual circumstance?

[jeremyyarbro]

They employ an interferometer nested inside another interferometer and mirrors that make weak measurements to try and find out the trajectory of photons. In fig. 2b you see that the path to detector from the nested interferometer is blocked, yet the detector registers that a photon struck mirrors C (outside the nested interferometer), A and B (inside the nested interferometer) but not E and F (at the entrance and exit of the nested interferometer). This seems like a really wild test of the ruleset here.