Vaccine breakthrough infections

preview_player
Показать описание
COVID-19: risk factors linked to post vaccination breakthrough infections

Clinical microbiology and infection

A minority of vaccinated individuals might get infected and suffer significant morbidity

Characteristics of vaccine breakthrough infections

Population (9 million) of Israeli patients, who were hospitalized with COVID-19 despite full vaccination.

Methods

Retrospective multicenter cohort study of 17 hospitals

Pfizer/BioNTech's BNT162b2 fully-vaccinated patients

Who developed COVID-19 and required hospitalization

(more than 7 days after the second vaccine)

(18% of admissions were before 21 days after second dose)

Alpha, B.1.1.7, 89% (UK)

Wildtype, 7%

Beta, B.1.351, 4% (SA)

Results

N = 152 patients

(half of hospitalized fully-vaccinated patients in Israel, 5.17million people)

Median age, 71.1 (range, 22-98) years

(half of hospitalized fully-vaccinated patients in Israel)

Poor outcomes in 38 patients

Mortality rate 22% (34/152)

Cohort characterized by a high rate of comorbidities

Hypertension 108, (71%)

Diabetes 73, (48%)

CHF 41, (27%)

Chronic kidney 37, (24%)

Chronic lung diseases 37, (24%)

Dementia 29, (19%)

Cancer 36, (24%)

No comorbidities, 9, (6 %)

Immunocompromised 60, (40%)

Higher SARS-CoV-2 viral-load was associated with a significant risk for poor outcome

Conclusions

Severe COVID-19 infection, with a high mortality rate, might develop in a minority of fully-vaccinated, with multiple comorbidities

(Higher rate of comorbidities and immunosuppression compared to non-vaccinated hospitalized patients)

Develop guidance to augment protection

Continued social-distancing

Additional vaccinations

(Israel, offering booster to immunocompramised)

WHO made errors

Said it will fix several unintended errors

Will look into other possible discrepancies

Questions from The Washington Post

Changing the virus sequence IDs associated with three of the 13 early patients

Will clarify that the first family cluster was not linked to the Huanan wet market in Wuhan

First patient, fell ill Dec. 8, 2019

Lived on the other side of the Yaangtze river, in Wuchang district

(WIV is in Jiangxia district)

Tarik Jasarevic, a WHO spokesman

the question of where the first-known patient lived relative to the river was not relevant to the origin of the virus

the current first known patient is most probably not the first case

mistakes in the report were due to editing errors

they did not affect the data analysis process, nor the conclusions

Lawrence Gostin, professor of global health law, Georgetown University

We need more explanation about what the source of the error and the information was

There’s no clarity, and this does feed into public distrust of the integrity and rigor of the origins investigation
Рекомендации по теме
Комментарии
Автор

I know with every report you make, people thankyou but now it's my turn. Your patient wife keeping quiet while you report, the hours spent collating the information, the excellent typing and your clear concise reports. You're our unsung hero John. We are so very grateful, thankyou.

jennystirrett
Автор

Errors are always unintentional after you get caught lying

markpoweski
Автор

So the takeaway is if you don’t want to die of Covid (or at least reduce the likelihood) then work on cutting out sugar, reducing blood pressure, get more exercise etc etc

tuppybrill
Автор

She asked what is the evidence. No evidence was given. Typical.

kychemclass
Автор

Surely we can’t say that 304 people were admitted out of 5 million as there were not 5 million infected patients. It would be useful to know the total number of cases within this vaccinated group and then the number of those that were hospitalised.

jamiecrawford
Автор

Can anyone explain why travel and work restrictions apply to those that have had covid, recovered and have T cell immunity whereas if you have the vaccine you are exempt . It’s always been the medical ethos that natural immunity is superior to vaccine immunity . Recent studies show that natural immunity offers better protection on variants than vaccine immunity, yet those with natural immunity are being treated as if they are completely unprotected . Never in the history of medicine have we insisted that those with natural immunity are forced to also have the vaccine to have any freedom . Something stinks .

mrdiavel
Автор

After not watching Dr John for about 3 months, I can see a change in the comments which I am glad, people are waking up

bellslinki
Автор

Dr John needs to revisit and correct his own unintended error. We all make mistakes, but, as has been pointed out, it's 304 hospitalizations from an UNSPECIFIED number of cases within a double vaccinated population of 5.17m.

It could be 304 out of 3000 cases or 15, 000 or so on. What it definitely won't be is 304 out of 5.17 m cases.

What are the daily case rates in Israel at present and what proportion has been double jabbed?

paulcharlesworth
Автор

Vaccinated - immune escape, more vaccines - immune escape and list goes on. How about therapeutics ? Like in India where they literally ended the pandemic using Ivermectin.

nandanap
Автор

To say that 304 were hospitalised out of a total of 5.17 million vaccinated But the 5.17 million were not all exposed to the virus so this is not a valid proportion.
You would need to compare with a similar number of unvaccinated of similar ages and comorbidities, living in the same level of virus circulation .

treewomanjones
Автор

It is certainly worth watching this presentation to the end. Classic British understatement and barely hidden distain once again from the brilliant Dr John Campbell.

hedydd
Автор

Sheep spend their life afraid of the wolf only to be slaughtered by the shepherd

Eyota
Автор

Between "Jingjangjong", " "There you go? There you go!", and "... and we're paying these people?", I'm dying over here! 🤣
I'm here for the science but I love the British sarcasm, wit, and dry humor. If you say you don't, I might say you're lying.
You're a true saint, Dr. John!

EggShensSixDemonBag
Автор

Well I think we can all agree one thing for certain, 'nothing is really making any sense at all' .

oriain
Автор

The term "unintended error" has a ring of guilt around out.

davidellis
Автор

but how many of that 5 million that were vaccinated were actually exposed to the virus?

to say 304 out of 5 million were hospitalised would not be an accurate number or relative percentage as only a small portion of that 5 million would of been actively exposed to the virus after immunisation. the actual percentage of those who get the virus after the vaccine and require hospitalisation would be much higher as only a small percentage of that 5 million would of been exposed

bladesamah
Автор

"....and we are paying these people." The Great quote of the day.

RenaissanceThinking
Автор

I like the smirk Dr Campbell. Loads of meaning in it. Thanks for all your efforts. Keep strong sir!

tuzaguilar
Автор

What is an "unintended error"? A strange conjunction of words. Begs the question if there are indeed "intended errors" in the WHO report.

viewnys
Автор

After almost 2 years of these reports/advice from ‘experts’, the world experience still seems like ‘six blind men describing an elephant’ …🤫🙏

nalinakshis