Episode 153: The Rational Decision Making Model, Part 2

preview_player
Показать описание


View additional videos from Alanis Business Academy and interact with us on our social media pages:

Listen to Alanis Business Academy on the go by downloading our new podcast:

The second of the two-part series on the rational decision making model. In this video we'll specifically discuss: generating a list of alternatives, evaluating those alternatives, and finally, computing the optimal decision.
Рекомендации по теме
Комментарии
Автор

I'm not clear on how the weights were assigned across the top row. I understand they came from the step 3 but am not following the math that established them?. Eg. LTS .60, Time .30, Cost .10 Can you please clarify?

matthewhubbard
Автор

After watching this video I now understand the model quite well. Thank you

Brown_Bambolina
Автор

Very clear and logical way to structure a model for RDM. It would be very nice if you can make a video with asset allocation RDM, specially to see the financial decision criteria that would apply to it. Thanks.

axionvirtus
Автор

Very happy that i found your channel. It's Awesome!

goldewl
Автор

Very interesting lesson. I would like to know how to do rate the long term criteria and denote it as 60 in the last slide?

AkashRamdoyal
Автор

love you so much, you saved my life when I was struggling with my decision-making coursework.

Ray-qlgz
Автор

I really enjoyed this video and the others. This is an excellent way to express and comprehend the decision-making process. It's quite entertaining to watch. I will continue to learn from here. Thanks!

denisemcillwain
Автор

Forgive me, but I still do not understand how you got the (.60), (.30), (.10) in your evaluation. Can you explain in more detail please ?

ievastephenjean
Автор

I understand the mechanics of what you explained, however could you please explain how you arrived at the particular numbers, e.g. "1.20", "2.40" - (I know it is from step 3 and the ranking, etc, but not quite understanding the numbers above) Thank you! 

natgardiner
Автор

Excellent video!!! Could you please suggest some of the references you used for search a little bit more. Thank you!!!

larissacaballero
Автор

hi, please clarify why u say that option 1 was favourable when it got the lowest score/total weightage?

sidrakhan
Автор

Thanks a lot... U have helped me a lot

praneethbabu
Автор

How do you get the weights in step 5, (.60), (.30), and (.10), from step three?

marlysiegal
Автор

i am a little bit confused you said Bigger home is the preffered decision when its total number is only 2.20 why not storage cause its total number is 2.80

kingk
Автор

😂😂 Place a few kids up for adoption? thank you for making these videos so interesting. 😂

manqobaradebe
Автор

How would you apply this theory to non-profit organisations?

my-raah
Автор

it would have being quite helpful (to me) if you gave your examples
refering  to management of business examples, , for instance low production cost in an you

bothwellsibanda
Автор

Please can you explain to me the political model??

gabrielappohmends
Автор

don`t understand:
 how to get the weight  of criteria from comparisons?
 why the best solution - with a lower number, but not with a bigger?

TheAlkovalenko
Автор

Sir how is absolute rationality an illusion?

sanjanaavanthkar