Charlie Kirk OWNES this guy⁉️✅❌ #charliekirk #debate

preview_player
Показать описание
In this video Charlie Kirk tells this guy why he is staying with his statement and makes it very clear that he didn’t mean it in any other way.

#charliekirk #debate #america #college #interview #duet
Рекомендации по теме
Комментарии
Автор

Freedom of speech is one thing, damaging property and making threats is another thing. Terrorists? YES

aaaaaeiou
Автор

If you don’t want to be called a “terrorist” don’t protest with violent groups!! Protest in a peaceful group with peaceful actions ONLY😢😮!!

valoriesalzman
Автор

I can't believe that all the obvious stuff need to deeply explained.

Leonhard_Euler
Автор

The Constitution of the United States ONLY protects peaceful protest. Peaceful does NOT include vandalism or threats.

HammerOn-bugx
Автор

Charlie is calling ANTIFA terrorist. When your group doesn’t explicitly condemn vandalism and violence, then yes the group is terrorist.

HuyNguyen-kwzc
Автор

Hmmm where have I heard these terrorists be called "mostly peaceful protesters" before?

I think it's time we stop forgiving the apologists for terrorists.

Nahrix
Автор

He's trying so hard to twist facts and start an argument

GraceHawley-pk
Автор

If you follow your bank robber friends to their bank robbery, even if you're not armed, you'll be charged as an accessory to the crime. Maybe if you don't want to be called a bank robber you shouldn't go to banks together with armed criminals with masks on.

OtiumBorealis
Автор

Calling someone Terrorist does not even infringe on their freedom of speech....what the hell is he even talking about...
He never said they have to be silenced, just that you can't destroy property, which is against the law and not protected by freedom of SPEECH.

sam-psonsmith
Автор

Charlie Kirk would be an asset in our government.He's intelligent sane and stable

theresarathell
Автор

If someone in your protest party starts threatening and vandalizing people and you choose not to stop it then you support them by default.

ThomasHarper-ycfd
Автор

If the word 'terrorist' offends you, then we'll call them 'vandals'. Vandalism is still a crime.
Next question...

paulhutchison
Автор

If they weren't protecting the terrorists, they would make sure they are arrested and separated from their cause.

mariannepolloni
Автор

If they're not terrorists why are they out there with terrorists ?

franklynch
Автор

Intimidation is free speech guys

India you're not sending your best right now

TitusLapassa-cr
Автор

Freedom of speech is not freedom from consequences

calebroberts
Автор

THEY are the ones being violent and making threats but he choses to confront Charlie for saying something not nice.. just another day in liberal America

robe
Автор

Ask him how he feels about the Jan 6ers.
I'm guessing he suddenly has zero problem with calling all of those people terrorists.

ascendedsleeper
Автор

He is so indoctrinated and educated he cannot tell the difference

Anipen
Автор

He's only offended because he probably has a vest in his trunk

adambomb