Review | Is The World’s Oldest Bible A Fake By David W. Daniels

preview_player
Показать описание
Pastor Steve Waldron, New Life of Albany - Albany, Ga

Рекомендации по теме
Комментарии
Автор

I was told by a retired prison ministry pastor that "most evangelicals consider Chick Publishers to be controversial." I don't. Could be the expose' on Billy Graham they offer in book form. Some people can do no wrong. Many are not taught, do not know or understand ecclesial separation, 2 Cor. 6

gek
Автор

Gotta love David Daniels. He doesn't know the meaning of the word QUIT! God bless him!

johndisalvo
Автор

Read the book carefully. Then respectfully refute his arguments if you can. I don’t think you can. God bless!

NewLifeOfAlbanyGa
Автор

Enjoyed your comments, Brother! I have read almost all of this book (on p269 now). Keep the vids coming!

donniegillum
Автор

Excellent video. I'm impressed with the work of David W. Daniels. He's 💯% correct.

However, people do come to Christ reading different translations.

Where is the balance in all this?

I like the KJV, MEV, and the Living Bible.

Thank you for your time, pastor.

Corey-MilkyWayWhisper
Автор

Also, there's Dr. David Sorenson's book "Neither Oldest Nor Best" about the fraudulent Vaticanus and Sinaiticus.

gek
Автор

This book is on my list to order soon.  I just received a half dozen books that I ordered from Chick Publications and am working my way through them.  Hopefully you will post an updated review once you have had a chance to read this book.  I agree with you regarding David Daniels presentation style.  He is great!

rogerdillon
Автор

A part of me wonders if he has any evidence other than his own opinion of "since it's (probably) different than the kjv, then it must be fake".

Virusskeptic-dz
Автор

You're reviewing a book that you haven't read yet?

garyg
Автор

Forgery or not its still corrupt no matter what..

stevie
Автор

isnt most of DD's proof anecdotal?

alanx
Автор

Quite apart from the discussion about its historical trustworthiness, I like to add that the Sinaiticus isn't a Bible as David Daniels seems to imply. It's a codex. About the half of the Old Testament is missing as well as portions of the NT.

stefaanvermeire
join shbcf.ru