filmov
tv
How to Instantiate a Class from a Running Process in .NET

Показать описание
Discover how to easily `instantiate a class` from a running process in .NET using event handling and named pipes. Learn with clear examples!
---
Visit these links for original content and any more details, such as alternate solutions, comments, revision history etc. For example, the original title of the Question was: How to instantiate a class from a running process
If anything seems off to you, please feel free to write me at vlogize [AT] gmail [DOT] com.
---
How to Instantiate a Class from a Running Process in .NET
In software development, it’s often the case that we need two applications to communicate and work together seamlessly. One common problem developers encounter is how to instantiate a class from a running process. In this guide, we explore how to achieve this in .NET Framework 4.8 while focusing on a practical example connecting two small programs.
The Scenario
Solution Overview
To approach this problem, we need to consider some communication methods between the two executables. In this explanation, we’ll look at two methods:
Using Event Handling for Simple Notifications
Using Named Pipes for Data Transmission
Both methods allow AnotherProggy to communicate with MyLittleProggy, but they vary in complexity and the type of data they can exchange.
Method 1: Using Event Handling for Notifications
In this method, MyLittleProggy will be notified each time AnotherProggy launches. Below is how you can implement this through a named event.
MyLittleProggy Code
[[See Video to Reveal this Text or Code Snippet]]
AnotherProggy Code
[[See Video to Reveal this Text or Code Snippet]]
Explanation
EventWaitHandle: This object allows one program (AnotherProggy) to signal another (MyLittleProggy) when it starts.
Set and Wait: namedEvent.Set() triggers the event, while MyLittleProggy waits for this signal.
Method 2: Using Named Pipes for Data Transmission
This method is more complex but can pass actual data from one program to another.
MyLittleProggy Code
[[See Video to Reveal this Text or Code Snippet]]
AnotherProggy Code
[[See Video to Reveal this Text or Code Snippet]]
Explanation
NamedPipeServerStream and NamedPipeClientStream: These classes allow MyLittleProggy and AnotherProggy to communicate through a pipe.
Sending and Receiving Data: AnotherProggy sends a message to MyLittleProggy, which reads and displays the data.
Conclusion
With the provided examples, you now have options to effectively instantiate a class from a running process in .NET. Whether you choose to use simple event notifications or named pipes for data transfer, the principle of inter-process communication remains the same.
Feel free to test these implementations, adapt them to your needs, and explore more complex communication patterns for your applications. Happy coding!
---
Visit these links for original content and any more details, such as alternate solutions, comments, revision history etc. For example, the original title of the Question was: How to instantiate a class from a running process
If anything seems off to you, please feel free to write me at vlogize [AT] gmail [DOT] com.
---
How to Instantiate a Class from a Running Process in .NET
In software development, it’s often the case that we need two applications to communicate and work together seamlessly. One common problem developers encounter is how to instantiate a class from a running process. In this guide, we explore how to achieve this in .NET Framework 4.8 while focusing on a practical example connecting two small programs.
The Scenario
Solution Overview
To approach this problem, we need to consider some communication methods between the two executables. In this explanation, we’ll look at two methods:
Using Event Handling for Simple Notifications
Using Named Pipes for Data Transmission
Both methods allow AnotherProggy to communicate with MyLittleProggy, but they vary in complexity and the type of data they can exchange.
Method 1: Using Event Handling for Notifications
In this method, MyLittleProggy will be notified each time AnotherProggy launches. Below is how you can implement this through a named event.
MyLittleProggy Code
[[See Video to Reveal this Text or Code Snippet]]
AnotherProggy Code
[[See Video to Reveal this Text or Code Snippet]]
Explanation
EventWaitHandle: This object allows one program (AnotherProggy) to signal another (MyLittleProggy) when it starts.
Set and Wait: namedEvent.Set() triggers the event, while MyLittleProggy waits for this signal.
Method 2: Using Named Pipes for Data Transmission
This method is more complex but can pass actual data from one program to another.
MyLittleProggy Code
[[See Video to Reveal this Text or Code Snippet]]
AnotherProggy Code
[[See Video to Reveal this Text or Code Snippet]]
Explanation
NamedPipeServerStream and NamedPipeClientStream: These classes allow MyLittleProggy and AnotherProggy to communicate through a pipe.
Sending and Receiving Data: AnotherProggy sends a message to MyLittleProggy, which reads and displays the data.
Conclusion
With the provided examples, you now have options to effectively instantiate a class from a running process in .NET. Whether you choose to use simple event notifications or named pipes for data transfer, the principle of inter-process communication remains the same.
Feel free to test these implementations, adapt them to your needs, and explore more complex communication patterns for your applications. Happy coding!