Experts agree, Bret Weinstein is WRONG

Contact me directly with questions and comments:

Previous Bret videos:

Mechanism of vaccine-induced myocarditis:

LNP “off-target” papers that Bret and company didn’t read:

Explanation on the radiolabeled lipid experiment:

[ricksamericana]

Bret Weinstein is wrong!?! I am shocked, shocked, I tell you.

[thenautilator]

13:27 Genuine question here: is it clear that your statement of "again they found mRNA present in primarily the muscle tissue at the injection site the draining lymph nodes" is in opposition to the statement that the mRNA can be found in the brain and heart, or in opposition to what Bret is claiming?

We should all agree with the simple statement of "mRNA can be found in the brain and heart, not just at the injection site", per your graph at 13:50 right? We can then talk about *how much* is found and say the authors characterize them as "trace amounts", and we can agree that it's orders of magnitude less than what's at the injection site.

However, what I'm missing from this argument for it to be complete, is an explanation of how the amounts found in the brain (that are relatively small in comparison to the injection site), are not a problem. Maybe this is part of the conflict with the disagreement between the two of you, or maybe I don't quite know what Bret has said, or maybe I missed the part where you explained this (maybe the "no measurable levels of antigen" part, not sure what role antigen plays in this argument).

13:50 my septic tank has 5680 shits in it, but if there's 1.82 shits in my bed, calling it "trace amounts by comparison" isn't satisfactory, I'm not sleeping in that bed.

[keithbertschin]

I once watched a video where Bret Weinstein and his brother suggested one or both of them should have received the Nobel prize, without irony!

[lewynld]

I have to ask, what happens to the lipids after they reach the muscle and liver tissue? Are they metabolized as other lipids are? Do we know?

[Shelmerdine]

“I have just staked my reputation…”

That’s not saying much. 😅

[jaycas]

I was 19 at the time of covid vx roll out. My doctor advised me that I was in the age risk of "rare" cardiac events from the vx. He also said that given my age exceptional health, I was statistically at little to no risk from any serious symptoms from covid. I was on the fence until i saw friends getting cardiac complications from the vx. 3 guys on my hockey team alone. One guy is still on medication for it. I said FK that! I didn't end up taking the covid vx and i did get covid. I've had worse hangovers. Way worse. I have no regrets in the decision I made.

[john.ellmaker]

Where is Rogan to tell Bret he is a chicken for not debating? Bret has had 4 years to study even the tiniest bit of immunology and can't do as well as an undergraduate taking introductory courses

[RichardRoy]

Thank you, Dr Wilson. Having qualified support is very reassuring. Much appreciated.

[standinstann]

Right from the get-go this guy is saying "I put my reputation on the line saying X on the internet, if I'm wrong there should be tons of biologists lining up to contradict me" So, biologists don't publish their findings on YouTube, they publish them in scientific journals. The question that everybody listening to this guy, or anyone else like him, ought to ask them selves is: If he has information that these vaccines are harmful in these various ways, why doesn't he publish these findings in a paper, instead of just *telling* us that they're harmful on a podcast?

[thenautilator]

There's a lot of use of the words "mostly", "primarily", and "mainly" in this video used in defense of the idea that something is NOT happening. This is confusing to me and I feel like this video needs to hammer home the argument that the *relatively* small amounts are not problematic. Just because something is relatively smaller, doesn't mean the absolute amount of the thing (edit: isn't) problematic.

I *think* this might be the argument that is made when Drew Weissman at 18:13 says "not lead to measurable levels of local antigen expression...", but it also confuses me that this statement seems to be in conflict with his statement that it *has indeed* been measured, when he says they "mainly" go to the lymph node, and that he *is indeed* aware of "rare" cases where the LNP's are distributed farther.

I guess I'm asking, is the following statement correct? Parts of this statement are not arguments directly stated in your video, which I think would have been nice to have expressed:
"There certainly *is* reason to believe that antigen is being expressed in the heart, due to the fact that both the mRNA and antigen are found to be present in the heart in studies such as the mice studies. But due to the fact that in humans, these levels are not measurable because they're likely so low, they do not pose a risk. The mechanism of damage that Brett is positing is the immune response caused by antigen expression in the heart. If there *is* an immune response caused by antigen expression in the heart, it is so small that we can't measure it. *And importantly*, we know based on other studies (not shown/mentioned in this video) that below a certain threshold of measurable antigen expression or immune response, that damage is insignificant or not problematic"

[samsmith]

Kin-hell Jasper deleted himself again. 😂😂

[amazingbollweevil]

I am so glad you're sticking to Weinstein and holding him accountable. I started following him when he appeared on the scene years ago and really liked his approach and reasoning. Eventually, though, I found him making claims that were a bit controversial, then claims with questionable support, then wholly unsupported by good evidence. He has drunk too deeply from the right-wing fountain of fortune.

[natearrigoni]

Its wild that people who don't want to put in the work of learning still get taken seriously. But it's from other people who also don't want to put in the work. Humans are inherently lazy; some just stay lazy.

[DavidDavisL]

Thanks for the clear presentation Dr. Wilson. I'm not going to hold my breath for a response.

[photoman]

(6:00) Except it doesn't say whether these so called "COVID death" subjects were also vaccinated or not

[carolecarolas]

I'm glad you take the time and effort to set the record straight. Thank you.

[kennethhodge]

Ludicrous argument from Weinstein regarding N protein...what about degradation rates, tissue specificity, etc. Coronaviruses are real experts at regulating the proportions of various protein products (unlike, say, flaviviruses, which pretty much produce 1:1:1... ratios of all proteins).

[hawaiianrobot]

11:49 - they're tracking the location of where the lipids in the LNPs end up... is there anything to say that the lipids are still in the liposome structure at this point? I don't know if there's a way to track when the liposomes are broken up, where that occurs, where mRNA expression is occuring, etc

just being like "the lipids end up in the liver, hence, all the mRNA is being made in the liver!!!" is a bad argument from Bret and co

[Mark_Jacobson]

At the beginning of the pandemic I was fully on board with the cdc, the who and the Australian health minister etc.
I then got jab injured.
Doctors said not the jab which is totally insane. It would be like going to a seafood restaurant for the first time, you eat a lobster have anaphylactic shock and then the doc tells you it couldn’t possibly be the seafood, it must have been from something else.

The fact is that hardly anything we were told was accurate.

The wet market hypothesis.
Effectiveness of masks.
Vaccine efficacy
Natural immunity
Vaccine side effects

We were all told that if we got the shots it was effectively the end of the pandemic.

Reality is as much as we have discovered about biology, we still know hardly anything.
I’m certainly glad that I am alive now and not in 1824, but everyone of the Covidians continue to act like everything is rock solid indisputable facts and every thing done during the pandemic was executed perfectly.

There is no humility in any of these comments sections.

While humanity will continue forwards and make strides against new diseases and other medical advancements, it really is sobering when you realise how little we really know and how limited most people are when it comes to a host of health ailments.

You only have to google a few different diseases or health conditions to see that often there are no cures or viable treatments.

Personally I just wish all of the wanna be science nerds will get off their high horses and admit that we know a lot, but there’s even more that we don’t now, and finally that this applies to mRNA vaccines. We are still learning, so quit acting like it’s not a possibility that they may be doing things that are totally unexpected.

[normanince]

Is Pfizer the sponsor for this podcast?