Kyle Rittenhouse acquitted of all charges

preview_player
Показать описание
Rittenhouse was 17 when he shot and killed two men during a protest over the shooting of Jacob Blake by police in Kenosha, he says he acted in self-defense.
Рекомендации по теме
Комментарии
Автор

Fun fact: everyone who didn't attack Kyle, didn't get shot.

geniuspharmacist
Автор

If you actually watched the trial this wouldn’t be a surprise. Crazy how the media flipped this

chrisbennett
Автор

This means you can defend yourself from anyone who threatens your life.

bglock
Автор

Burn, loot and murder is not "prostesting". He had every right to defend himself.

cattinkerbell
Автор

Imagine that, it's not illegal to defend yourself while being attacked and having an assailant point a gun at you.

The correct verdict was reached by this jury.

SanBrunoBeacon
Автор

Hilarious how the prosecutor destroyed his own case.

plainsimplegarak
Автор

I like how the "victim" even admitted rittenhouse only shot after the guy pulled and pointed a gun at him, and yet people are still saying he deserves life in prison...

madman
Автор

He never should have been charged in the first place. They should have let him go the same way all left-wing rioters are let go. Regardless, this is a huge win for the 2nd amendment.

Elwood
Автор

Kyle’s best defense lawyer is the prosecutor.

dtsh
Автор

The prosecution was so filled with hate, they forgot they had to prove their case.

__GALLANT__
Автор

Crazy kenosha accepted the national guard this time but didn’t during the riots that lead to all of this

shawnm
Автор

This is justice. The right to defend yourself MUST be preserved. The evidence is clear as air, and he acted in self defense.

iamrockness
Автор

Still trying to figure out how this is racial, despite the President, divisionists and media trying to constantly stoke that fire.

buoyant
Автор

MSM: "Why are we losing customers?"
CONSULTANT: "Because you're lying."
MSM: "Yeah, but why are we losing customers?"

cybervigilante
Автор

Okay, to all news organizations that are going to cover this after the verdict.. You now have to say he acted in self defense against 3 demonstrators that were trying to attack him. There is no grey area anymore. The jury has spoken. You cant say "He CLAIMED he used his gun as self defense" The verdict says that he DID use it in self defense.

matthewberglof
Автор

The Prosecutor was the Best Defense Attorney. Someone give him an award.

Zraekor
Автор

For all those who are mad about the acquittal, I will be interested to hear what you would do if someone was hitting you with a skateboard, someone who had told you they were going to kill you was chasing you, and someone had a pistol pointed at you. I think Rittenhouse was an idiot for going there in the first place, but he did have the right to be there and also to defend himself when he was attacked.

mikehughes
Автор

It wasn't a murder trial it was a self defence trial

richardwoowoo
Автор

Bruh he didn't shoot 2 men protesting the shooting of Jacob Blake, he shot 2 men actively attacking him as he was running away. That's like me going to pray at a church then I attack someone there and get shot, then the media will say "a man who was praying at a church was shot" completely ignoring the fact of who the aggressor and attacker was in the first place.

KesumaofEO
Автор

I think this is an important time to remind everybody that this man just defended self-defense as a whole for the country. This had nothing to do with murder and everything to do with our right to defend ourselves.

discoveryoutdoorskcfishing
join shbcf.ru