Carlos Alcaraz v Daniil Medvedev | Semi-final 1 Highlights | #WimbledonOnStar

preview_player
Показать описание
Defending champion Carlos Alcaraz overcame a determined Daniil Medvedev (6-7, 6-3, 6-4, 6-4) to advance to consecutive Wimbledon Final.

Enjoy the Wimbledon Final, where the Spaniard meets #NovakDjokovic, in Hindi on Star Sports 1 Hindi & Star Sports Network.

#WimbledonOnStar | Sunday, 14th July | Star Sports Network
Рекомендации по теме
Комментарии
Автор

Thank you star sports for this entertaining video 👏👍

spiritualtiger
Автор

YES THANK YOU SO MUCH for these extended highlights

KillerTacos
Автор

Somebody, please tell these commentators that they don't have to talk every single minute. Let the viewers enjoy the game.

dufort-iq
Автор

I love these highlights, normally Wimby official gives us only like...3 minute highlights

vidhead
Автор

U no need to bring out the hindi commentary for every other sports...It suits cricket thats okay...but not any other sports specially tennis ...
Commenting is an art not irritating like this hindi commentators

mriganka
Автор

I don't mind the commentary at all. I think it adds to the energy of the match. What do you guys want, complete silence? Yawn. 😴

notsohandytim
Автор

Медведев с Алькарасом сыграл гораздо лучше, чем Джокович! Джокович в финале вообще ничего не показал!

АзаматАзамат-кб
Автор

Обожнюю спостерігати як Карлос шиє в дурні топових гравців! Я б йому і поразку вибачив!

andreyaleynikov
Автор

Every once in a while I see a shot on a post-game video that seems clearly at odds with the declared result. Carlos breaks at 21:56, as the crosscourt shot from Meddy is ruled to have overshot the end line, and Carlos, who is looking right down on it, also reacts as if it is clearly out. Yet I have replayed it about 20 times, and even managed to freeze it a number of times as the ball hits the ground, and to my eye it seems like the ball not only lands within the outside edge of the line, but within the inside edge! Does anyone out there see the same thing?

lsmart
Автор

Congratulations, Alvaraz, but It wasn't fair

ramtinsadigh
Автор

Meddy is hitting awkwardly in this match!

jongamali
Автор

I hoped, that this year WTA/ATP/ITF, would stop this nonsense of mixing sport with politics.
Every player should have right to play under her/his country's flag. One cannot choose the country of one's birth.
Appointing "flag police" at tennis tournaments is not even childish... it is embarrassing and insane...
Wars are run by politicians not sportsmen/sportswomen.
Why during the invasion of Iraq, 20 year bombing of Afghanistan, Syria, Yemen and Pakistan not to mention the genocidal Vietnam war US, Australian, UK... athletes were allowed to compete under their national flag?
USA invaded Iraq in 2003 and yet their flag was still allowed at the World Cup 2006 in Germany and 2010 in South Africa despite the fact they were still in Iraq.
Either ban ALL flags of countries who go to war, or don't ban any of them.
Interestingly enough Israeli tennis players Mika Buchnik and Guy Sasson are allowed to play under the national flag in AO 2024 despite the policy of their government towards Palestinians in Gaza.
***
All wars are equal, but some wars are more equal than others.

kirrausanov
Автор

That Russian needs to be conscription with that talent 😂😂

jone
Автор

Who thought of putting Hindi commentators on Wimbledon? Exclusive Hindi speakers don't watch tennis. And there is a considerable non Hindi speaking population in India, especially in the South who not only watch but play tennis. What is this bhaiyafication of Star Sports. I had to watch the highlights in mute to save myself from this uncouth verbal abuse. Frankly this type of crap doesn't go with tennis for heaven's sake. What next? Formula 1 commentry in Bhojpuri? I wouldn't have minded that if Yogi would let the race return at Buddha Circuit. But no, it's not sport, eh? Who was that, the older Yadav, isn't it? Pathetic.

Mindfookfilms