Mod-01 Lec-12 Convex Optimization

preview_player
Показать описание
  1. nptelhrd
  2. Convex Optimization
Рекомендации по теме
Mod-01 Lec-12 Convex 0:44:23

Mod-01 Lec-12 Convex Optimization

Mod-01 Lec-12 Optimization 0:39:04

Mod-01 Lec-12 Optimization

Mod-01 Lec-14 Convex 0:44:40

Mod-01 Lec-14 Convex Optimization

Mod-01 Lec-15 Convex 0:52:45

Mod-01 Lec-15 Convex Optimization

Mod-01 Lec-13 Convex 0:46:42

Mod-01 Lec-13 Convex Optimization

Mod-01 Lec-16 Convex 0:42:42

Mod-01 Lec-16 Convex Optimization

Mod-01 Lec-17 Convex 0:44:52

Mod-01 Lec-17 Convex Optimization

Mod-01 Lec-25 Convex 0:42:25

Mod-01 Lec-25 Convex Optimization

Mod-01 Lec-35 Convex 0:39:22

Mod-01 Lec-35 Convex Optimization

Mod-01 Lec-11 Convex 0:41:25

Mod-01 Lec-11 Convex Optimization

Mod-01 Lec-19 Convex 0:42:27

Mod-01 Lec-19 Convex Optimization

Mod-01 Lec-24 Convex 0:47:03

Mod-01 Lec-24 Convex Optimization

Mod-01 Lec-21 Convex 0:43:34

Mod-01 Lec-21 Convex Optimization

Mod-01 Lec-20 Convex 0:35:54

Mod-01 Lec-20 Convex Optimization

Mod-01 Lec-26 Convex 0:49:57

Mod-01 Lec-26 Convex Optimization

Mod-01 Lec-34 Convex 0:36:22

Mod-01 Lec-34 Convex Optimization

Mod-01 Lec-22 Convex 0:37:26

Mod-01 Lec-22 Convex Optimization

Mod-01 Lec-07 Convex 0:47:27

Mod-01 Lec-07 Convex Optimization

Mod-01 Lec-36 Optimization 0:42:17

Mod-01 Lec-36 Optimization

Mod-01 Lec-30 Convex 0:42:39

Mod-01 Lec-30 Convex Optimization

Mod-01 Lec-33 Convex 0:45:01

Mod-01 Lec-33 Convex Optimization

Mod-01 Lec-39 Convex 0:38:05

Mod-01 Lec-39 Convex Optimization

Mod-01 Lec-23 Convex 0:39:30

Mod-01 Lec-23 Convex Optimization

Mod-01 Lec-31 Convex 0:39:55

Mod-01 Lec-31 Convex Optimization

Комментарии
Автор

Thank you very much Professor Dutta for the lecture. I have been having great fun following the journey. I just wish to ask a question: I see when you are using the separation theorem to show that S is in fact equal to the normal cone of C at xbar,  you put zero in the middle of the inequalities rather than some unknown alfa. Can I do so in other proofs as well if the set in question is a cone? In lecture 14, when we prove that K is K itself, why did we not use zero as alfa and make the proof simpler?

lf
Автор

In 2:49, why do we have that optimization? What is the linkage between normal cone definition and this problem?

tsznamchan