Introduction to Linguistics: Basics of Language

preview_player
Показать описание
Lecture 2. Prof. Futrell discusses some of the key properties of human language, and the notion of a descriptive grammar.
Рекомендации по теме
Комментарии
Автор

i cant believe youre posting this for oh merci ……

emily-biue
Автор

I have a BA in English studies as a non-native speaker all I can say is thank you incredibly much for this series.

Onyx_
Автор


In this first lecture, Professor Futrell presents these key questions: What are the basics properties of language? And what distinguishes human language from other communication systems?

| Communicativity | - means that language is used for communication, where there needs to be a production of and perception of utterances, also known as modality.
There are 3 modalities:
Auditory-Visual (spoken)
Visual-gestural (sign language)
Visual-written(written language)

| Semanticity | - means all forms have a meaning or function.
There are 3 semiotics:
Icon (form resembles the meaning)
Index (form resembles a result of the meaning)
Symbol (form is associated with the meaning arbitrarily, by convention)
Majority of form-meaning associations are symbolic ( Also known as the arbitrariness of the sign)

| Cultural transmission | - You learn a language from other people. The language you learn is determined by the people you interact with

| Displacement | - Language can be spoken even when the object/entity is not present

| Productivity | - Linguistic units can be recombined to express novel meanings, implying that you can express an infinite number of new ideas by recombining parts.
good + ness
bad + ness
pine-scented + ness

More vocab:
| Descriptive Grammar | - description of how a language as it is actually spoken, signed, and written.
Vs.
| Prescriptive Grammar | - Someone’s set of rules for how language should be spoken, signed, or written.

| Mental Grammar | - You have an intuition of the rules of your language.

ky-vinhmai
Автор

Man!!! You´re amazing! I got a lot of insights! Thank you, greetings from Brazil!

viniciusleonelPoliglota
Автор

i'd love to say thank you so much professor and whoever uploaded this video! it helps me a lot.

kevinballad
Автор

really grateful for this linguistics course series because my University Professor sucks, so thank you!!

jasonbernard
Автор

About descriptive vs. prescriptive grammar.
Once I saw a sentence which went roughly like this: Less young people have a child. And I thought 'less young, so are they in their 30s?'. Then I realized they meant FEWER young people have a child. And I was like 'dude, you had ONE rule to follow'. This less vs. fewer rule is not there to preserve older forms of English. It's there for a good reason. _Less_ ambiguity leads to _fewer_ misunderstandings which increases comprehensibility. So please don't lump this rule together with the other ones you mentioned. I don't care if the preposition is at the end. I don't care if you don't use _whom_ correctly. But the less vs. fewer rule *makes sense.*

gabor
Автор

Is there a proof that productivity actually can recombine words into unlimited ways to express novel meaning? Is there unlimited novel concepts for instance?

nox
Автор

Is there a way to download the powerpoints to study from?

andrewanthony
Автор

Great lecturer and great course! Thanks a lot!

lhexagoneplus
Автор

Would the modality of Braille be tactile-written?

lirisa
Автор

there is another way to communicate something to someone: physical violence (like the slap of Will Smith who wanted to communicate his disappointment).

starman
Автор

A less unaware communicative modality would be telepathy

Example of a telepathic experience

1. Johnny was thinking about sally. The next day Sally calls Johnny

AwokenMinds
Автор

44:58 but i think thou and You distinction is better, because it removes ambiguity for first person singular or plural meaning. why not consider Prescriptive Grammer in linguistics to manage limitations of language

nitishgautam
Автор

Would "the chocolate, I ate" be considered grammatical? It's not normal, but I have heard people talk like this to add emphasis

wowowowzzz
Автор

If writing is just a supplement of spoken languages why we call them written languages. They're not languages in and of themselves. Isn't it? Why not just call them writing systems of spoken languages. Is that case English is then a spoken language with a writing system, but it's not a written language in and of itself.

harshitrajput
Автор

Nice 3:16 n 4:34 n 14:36 n 25:35 good 26:00 n 40:01 n 46:08

Alamin-lkti
Автор

Hai sir my question is what if a each letter or each sound have meaning what we call that kind of language

smartguy
join shbcf.ru