Resolving the Extra Field Issue in Spring Boot JSON Responses

Discover how to eliminate extra fields in your Spring Boot application responses with simple adjustments to getter and setter methods.
---

Visit these links for original content and any more details, such as alternate solutions, latest updates/developments on topic, comments, revision history etc. For example, the original title of the Question was: Extra field coming in get response in spring boot application

If anything seems off to you, please feel free to write me at vlogize [AT] gmail [DOT] com.
---
Resolving the Extra Field Issue in Spring Boot JSON Responses

When developing a Spring Boot application, you might encounter the frustrating situation where your JSON responses include extra fields, leading to confusion and unnecessary data clutter. Imagine you have a booking service, and upon making a GET request, you receive an unexpected response that looks something like this:

[[See Video to Reveal this Text or Code Snippet]]

In this case, the presence of both datetime and date fields can be perplexing. Let's dive into the problem and its resolution.

Understanding the Problem

The root of this issue lies in how your getter and setter methods are defined within your booking model. In your current implementation:

[[See Video to Reveal this Text or Code Snippet]]

Here are the key points leading to the extra field:

Naming Convention: The method names getDatetime() and setDateTime() do not directly correlate with the field name date.

Automatic Property Detection: Jackson, the library often used for JSON processing in Spring Boot, automatically generates JSON field names based on getter and setter method names. Thus, it identifies both datetime and date due to their different method names.

Solution

To resolve the issue of the extraneous field appearing in your JSON response, you have two effective solutions at your disposal.

1. Renaming Getter and Setter Methods

The simplest solution is to align the getter and setter method names with the field name. Here’s how you can do it:

[[See Video to Reveal this Text or Code Snippet]]

By renaming the methods, you direct Jackson to use only the date field in the JSON output.

2. Using -JsonProperty Annotation

If, for some reason, you cannot change the method names, you can specify the correct mapping using the -JsonProperty annotation. This effectively tells Jackson to treat the method as referring to a specific JSON property. Here’s how to implement this:

[[See Video to Reveal this Text or Code Snippet]]

By adding the -JsonProperty("date") annotation to both the getter and setter, you indicate that these methods correspond to the same property in the JSON output.

Conclusion

In conclusion, if you ever find yourself facing the extra field issue in your Spring Boot application's JSON responses, remember to check your getter and setter method names relative to your model properties. With either method — renaming or using annotations — you can easily ensure your API responses are clean and maintainable, ultimately improving the user experience.

If you continue to encounter issues or have further questions, don't hesitate to ask fellow developers or consult Spring Boot documentation. Happy coding!