PROJECT 2025: Author defends conservative plan from attacks | LiveNOW from FOX

preview_player
Показать описание
Project 2025, also known as the Presidential Transition Project, is a collection of conservative policy proposals and potential picks to fill positions if Donald Trump is reelected as president in November.

The Heritage Foundation, a conservative nonprofit, organized the plan in 2022 which is "guided by the conservative cause to address and reform the failings of big government and an undemocratic administrative state," according to the Project 2025 website.

Raw and unfiltered. Watch a non-stop stream of breaking news, live events and stories across the nation. Limited commentary. No opinion. Experience LiveNOW from FOX.
Рекомендации по теме
Комментарии
Автор

Get corporate money out of politics. Regulate the activities of big companies. Nothing good can come from our political system until our government works for the people and not corporations. You can’t say you care about families and at the same time support the corporate take over of our government.

AmberMyers-ekbp
Автор

I’m not religious or anything, but did the devil take over these people’s bible or something, WTH is wrong with them?!?

lisamari
Автор

Read the mandate, decide for yourself. I find it terrifying and disgusting but make up your own mind.

Mouspital
Автор

That statement makes no sense! How can you say that project 2025 is about individual sovereignty when it’s all about more government control and involvement. Sovereignty is about less government not more!

barefootexpedition
Автор

I went straight to taxes section. Wants to drop the corporate tax rate to 18%. Corporations already are allowed to deduct all expenses related in running the business. Why keep helping Corporations. Barely saw anything about tax reform for individuals.

byronm
Автор

Project 2025 is the OFFICIAL SPONSOR of next week's RNC convention... in case Trump tries to deny it’s his platform again.

xexbnew
Автор

The more I read about Project 2025, the more disturbing it gets.

lirpa
Автор

After these goons said we can't help anybody because we have to take care of our own, they drew up a plan for $286.6B in austerity for disabled veterans.

samjohnson
Автор

If they were really interested in restoring the American family, they would want the poor and middle class to be capable of surviving with one stay-at-home parent. Nowadays, it's almost impossible for most families to survive without two incomes - meanwhile companies are making record profits that aren't "trickling down" to workers!

chrisskaw
Автор

This project is insane, plesse read it, don't just watch news!¡!!!

salmacaribbean
Автор

It's baseD on the individual and family. WHAT A LOAD OF BS!!!

jeffelzey
Автор

Being able to easily fire public servants sounds great but is actually very short sighted. So assuming Trump gets back in - sure he can clean house. But then so can the next admin, thus leading to a huge centralization of power as no public servant's butt would be safe unless they bow to the new admin. Long term I doubt this is a good idea.

daven
Автор

Serve the president they are supposed to serve the American people

markcummings
Автор

Ensuring sovereignty of individuals and families, may rear end. These policies will limit freedoms for so many Americans.

lori
Автор

Project 2025 displays the issue with conservative politics for at least the last 10 or more years where they can identify the issue but then offer the wrong policy. The main issues with this doctrine are that it interjects too much religion into American governance, which is unconstitutional, it incorrectly identifies its opposition as socialists or Marxists, and it seems too driven by cold war policies that are partly the root cause of many of our internal and external issues. Here are the issues that I have identified, but this is not an exhaustive list:

1. Religion does not belong in politics. We are a multicultural society with many religions. The first amendment to the constitution prohibits the establishment of a religion. When the first amendment was adopted, the world was experiencing hundreds of years of religious wars and persecutions that created inhumane treatment of people. We do not want to put in place the conditions to allow that here, hence why the establishment of religion is forbidden.

2. They go on a lot about the administrative state and want to "go back" to congressional control of American policy. They claim congress has been lazy by writing vague laws and then allowing the agencies to "write the law". I trust the scientists more than the politicians to specify the regulations. They can also act quicker than congress as knowledge and technology change. If a regulation is bad, congress can undo it. They regulate for a reason.

3. It is disappointing that these people continue to talk about oil and gas as if that were the only and best way to ensure American energy independence and economic dominance. Perhaps these people worked for the likes of Kodak and Sears and can't seem to understand where the future of energy is. Green energy is the future of energy, and it can be centered in the US or China. I prefer that it be centered in the US. It will be a far better foreign policy carrot than oil and gas to Africa and South America long term.

4. Their foreign policy came out of the cold war since they seem to talk a lot about socialism, Marxism, and communism. Last I checked, the USSR does not exist, and all socialist modeled countries are insignificant. While China claims to be socialist or communist, they are sort of a mix. The biggest issue is their unfair trade practices such as their government supports businesses to favorably compete against ours.

5. It is hard to take seriously policy from people who call everyone socialists from their internal opposition, who they call internal enemies, and European nations who we are allied with. None of these are socialist. It seems they are very worried about popular programs because they serve rich friends who want to pay no taxes. They celebrate Vermont having to cancel a universal healthcare system, even though it is beyond dispute that a universal healthcare program in the US can lower costs by 20% to 30% while ensuring everyone has access. If this is socialism, OK. Tell me how that is bad? Note that universal healthcare is not government healthcare. It is a framework of regulations and programs that help streamline health services, billing, transparent pricing, fair, consumer friendly, while still allowing businesses to profit.

There is so much more, and I am sure if I get into the weeds of this doctrine, it can be torn apart in how bad it is. But given who wrote this and who supports this, these are things that most Americans will not like or find acceptable, and demonstrates that the conservatives who like this are stuck in a bygone era that they hope to bring back that will likely make the country less prosperous than we could otherwise make it with what we have been doing under Biden. We need change, clearly, but not this.

michaellazar
Автор

The greed for power is blatant and so dangerous. We need a moderate candidate. Not right and not left. This is not about what's good for the country!

lmarie
Автор

1000 conservative analysts is not tens of Millions of voters.

anakidd
Автор

This is utter insanity and no Thank You

michwashington
Автор

If not so bad why does Chump deny anything to do with it. 🇺🇸💙

tommclain
Автор

Manifesto was the word the reporter was looking for.

chadmccoy