This integral taught me Feynman's technique

preview_player
Показать описание
This is an integral from the 2005 Putnam exam. It's the first integral I had ever solved using Feynman's trick of differentiating under the integral sign and I think it's one of the best examples on how to apply the technique.

My complex analysis lectures:

If you like the videos and would like to support the channel:

You can follow me on Instagram for write ups that come in handy for my videos and DM me in case you need math help:

My LinkedIn:

Advanced MathWear:
Рекомендации по теме
Комментарии
Автор

I love when the derivative jumps over the integral sign and becomes a partial. Never gets old! :D

emanuellandeholm
Автор

Great video. Finally i have understood the famous Feynman's technique.

thiagorc
Автор

had my math exam today, and your channel really helped!

arunknown
Автор

I knew this one with the king's property "∫f(x)dx = ∫f(a+b-x)dx" with the same result! It's nice seeing the same problem resolved by 2 different approaches!

baptFulbion
Автор

I recently got introduced to a similar integral except the integrand is

Int(ln(1+x^2)/(1+x)) from 0 to 1. You should try this one with Feynman’s trick, the choice and placement of parameter might surprise you.

SuperSilver
Автор

This problem was in our college exam but we were told to do it by trigo
Since by seeing your videos i tried it by Feynman and got answer really quick
Thanks bro

anaymulay
Автор

The integral / derivative switch up doesn't only require the integral to converge for certain values of alpha, normally you also want the partial derivative with respect to x to be continous by parts and the partial derivative with respect to alpha to be continous and smaller than an integrable function depending only of x between 0 and 1 (in that case x / (1+x²) wouldve worked)

intellix
Автор

Just wonderful integral and its explanation ❤sir.

bandishrupnath
Автор

i think a simple tanx = u, then applying integral (f(x) = integral f(a+b-x) will work where the limits are a to b

mystik
Автор

Usually log is the base 10 logarithm and ln is the natural logarithm.

HenkVanLeeuwen-io
Автор

Thank you for your featured effort. Instead of log/2, it should be log2/2.

MrWael
Автор

Brilliant.
Can you tell us what's the name of the software/app into which you write ✍️ so that it shows up on your computer screen?

bobbybannerjee
Автор

I tried defining I(a)=integral from 0 to 1 of (x+1)^a/(1+x^2) dx, since I’(a=0) gives the integral in this video, alas the resulting integral is no better than what we started with, or at least I got stuck on it!

joshuaiosevich
Автор

Is possible to integrate 1/(1+x^5) with thia method?

CaioFalconieriLima
Автор

can I use this method for computing the integral with variable upper bound and parameter? I mean I(t, a) = integral of log(1+ax)/(1+x^2) from zero to t. I'm getting a formula, but it's numerically definitely wrong.
EDIT: I see where's the problem. The observation from 9:33 doesn't work in general, so I only computed I(a, a)=arctan(a)*log(1+a^2)/2 which is no good!

Czeckie
Автор

Great solution development, Please solve Bee integrals in the next videos

adhamkassem
Автор

L'ho fatto con le serie risultato è corretto, ma non ho voglia di raggrupparli...

giuseppemalaguti
Автор

Could you solve this with 1/(1+x^2) = sum_(k=0) (-1)^k x^{2k} and then switch sum & integral, and then you get x^(2k) * log(1+x), solvable with IBP?

quite_unknown_
Автор

3:54 since when did partial fractions feel hospitable lol

skyethebi
Автор

just do tan sub and some manipulation (no feynman)

Mr_Mundee