Indra Sawhney v. Union of India | Mandal Commission case | Reservation | #UPSC #IAS #CSE #OnlyIAS

preview_player
Показать описание
Indra Sawhney v. Union of India, known as the Mandal Commission case, is a very significant pronouncement of the Supreme Court on the question of reservation of posts for backward classes. The Court has dealt with this question in a very exhaustive manner. This case has overruled the judgement laid down in the case of Devadasan v. Union of India, stating that the rule of carried forward is applicable unless it does not breach the 50% rule. Analysis of this case gives a clear picture of how reservation works in India.

For Course related information, you can call at 7007931912
Рекомендации по теме
Комментарии
Автор

जो भी रिजर्वेशन या पॉजिटिव डिस्क्रिमिनेशन का विरोध करता है वह जस्टिस चाहता ही नहीं है या जस्टिस को समझता ही नहीं है

satishrbl
Автор

No English channel for such important judgement series for better understanding?

SD_Creations
Автор

In the beginning, You are mentioning socially and economically backward class reservation under clause 4 of 16 and later on you are saying socially and educationally backward class reservation. This creates confusion.

aabhasagar
Автор

Thank you so much sir, excellent way of explanation.

jagdishjena
Автор

Aap explain Kam confuse jyada kar rahe ho

jagmohanswain
Автор

अगर किसी को आरक्षण खत्म कराना है तो मिलकर लड़ो मैं भी साथ हु तुम्हारे sc से ही हूँ लेकिन इसकी जिम्मेदारी को लेगा कि एक गरीब भी नौकरी करेगा ओर उसके साथ भेदभाव नही होगा।। आजा

Gaming.
Автор

Why we not merge obc and ews becoz both are same criteria in Rajasthan only income less than 8 lakh

ocieantringle
Автор

Namste sir
different between SEBC and OBC.

akashsenta
Автор

Sir your explanation makes confusion for me

ajeetsinghshikarwar
Автор

Sir make a one video on IMP.
Committee and commission in india related to upsc....

riteshmishra
Автор

जब तक देश में cast के आधार पर आरक्षण रहेगा तब तक देश की जो प्रतिभा वाली क्रीम है वो देश के बाहर जाती रहेगी...

adityasinghrathore