Troubleshooting a Merge Sort Algorithm in C+ +

Discover common pitfalls in merge sort algorithms and learn how to fix them efficiently with our in-depth guide.
---

Visit these links for original content and any more details, such as alternate solutions, latest updates/developments on topic, comments, revision history etc. For example, the original title of the Question was: Why does this merge sort algorithm not work properly?

If anything seems off to you, please feel free to write me at vlogize [AT] gmail [DOT] com.
---
Troubleshooting a Merge Sort Algorithm in C+ + : A Step-by-Step Guide

Sorting algorithms are essential in programming, and merge sort is one of the most efficient methods. However, bugs can sometimes slip into our code, causing unexpected behavior. In this post, we will tackle a specific problem with a merge sort algorithm that displayed odd results without any error messages.

The Problem

Imagine you have a C+ + program that implements a merge sort algorithm. The objective is to sort an array of integers, but instead of getting the sorted output we're expecting, we receive confusing results. The output looks something like this:

[[See Video to Reveal this Text or Code Snippet]]

This output indicates that while the first part of the array seems sorted, the latter half is entirely incorrect. The immediate question arises: What went wrong with this merge sort implementation?

Understanding the Code

Let’s look at the structure of the original code to identify potential issues:

[[See Video to Reveal this Text or Code Snippet]]

Key Issues Identified

Incorrect Loop Bound in the Final Copy:
The loop at the end that copies from temp back to arr incorrectly uses s < 11, which does not respect the original merge bounds defined by l and r. This leads to overwrites and reading beyond the intended limits of the array.

Understanding Subarray Ranges:
The merge function should loop from l to r, not a fixed size of 11. This misstep results in accessing invalid memory locations, producing garbled outputs.

The Solution

To fix these issues, we need to modify the final loop to ensure it respects the correct bounds of the merged subarrays. Here’s the corrected code:

[[See Video to Reveal this Text or Code Snippet]]

Full Corrected Implementation

Here’s a cleaner and more functional version of the entire merge sort program:

[[See Video to Reveal this Text or Code Snippet]]

Conclusion

By addressing the issues of loop bounds in our merge function, we can resolve the problems with our merge sort implementation. This change ensures the algorithm works as intended, delivering properly sorted results.

If you encounter similar issues while implementing sorting algorithms, always check loop boundaries and the flow of data between your temporary and main arrays. Happy coding!