Conqueror vs IS-7 | APDS | Armor Penetration Simulation

preview_player
Показать описание
Simulation of Conqueror tank projectile hitting the turret front armor of IS-7 tank

120mm L1 (Tungsten Carbide core APDS) at 1410 m/s

vs

230mm 260 BHN cast armor at 36 degrees. IS-7 turret, less sloped area near the mantlet.

120mm Ordnance QF gun muzzle velocity - 1463 m/s. 1410 m/s refers to a distance of approximately 0.6 km.
Рекомендации по теме
Комментарии
Автор

UFP: I deflect 460mm shells
Turret: help subcaliber scary

cuchococh
Автор

This is around that time when people started to realize that adding a crap ton of armor didn't really matter for much and made people rethink how they did armor on tank's which would later lead to some pretty creative ways of adding more protection to tank's than just the typical *"Durrr I add more steel That'll work"* way's of thinking of WWII

CarmineKarK
Автор

Seeing that the velocity is barely 300 m/s after penetrating, I wonder how much more armor would be needed to stop it? Some 20-30mm extra?

nikolanis
Автор

I can't believe that the conq, a tank designed to kill IS-3's and IS-7's, could penetrate an IS-7. Truly astonishing.

Still cool to see whether it would've, in practice, been good enough to kill an IS-7

cookiecraze
Автор

it went through so clean as if the armor was butter

Ciao
Автор

Interested to see if the Japanese Type 3 75mm cannon would’ve actually been effective against a sherman hull :) great videos btw

dr.raccoonphd
Автор

IS7: "I fear no man. But that... thing... it scares me"
[loud maintenance noises]

Treblaine
Автор

People need to keep in mind that this is the perfect scenario, few cm to the right and it's a non pen.

Sveta
Автор

I am not sure if this was asked already but, could you try and do one of the experimental WW2 German sabot rounds? APHEDS I guess, where a 88 shell would use a normal 75 shell as the sabot etc. Perhaps tested against the IS-3 or Jumbo Pershing (or T32)?

alexsv
Автор

good work dejmian, i enjoy your content keep up the good work :)

ovhgermany
Автор

can you also fire some sort of block instead of a normal bullet with other parameters equal to a different test to show the difference?

Echinacae
Автор

can you please add next time 1mm thin Al foil to see potential damage to crew? many thanks for your awesome work!

hoholu
Автор

Great to see simulation of two of my most favorite tanks :) Thanks :)

pawegodman
Автор

dont need the witness plate for that one

Halophile
Автор

Still incredible to see armour grade steel splash like a liquid around the initial impact point

maxkennedy
Автор

How about a 115 mm round (BM-6) of T-62 against T-72M1? Seems appropriate given the circumstances. Front hull or the turret, your choice.

kamilszadkowski
Автор

Could you do a super high velocity projectile (around 5-10km/s) against a meter or two of concrete? Im curious as to what would happen if you hit concrete fortifications or rock face with a railgun

gossogames
Автор

Show this to War Thunder; after they nerfed APDS and the Conqueror in particular. Its 120mm APDS is performing worse than the Centurions Mk. 10s 105mm APDS currently.

JordanLewis
Автор

When a projectile penetrates but the tank isn't destroyed, how is the hole repaired?

tonyennis
Автор

what about vs is7 upper hull frontally?

SToXC_.