Abraham Holland Knew...

preview_player
Показать описание
A contemporary that 'William Shakespeare' died shortly before October 1604!

Abraham Holland corroborates the 1604 death of Shakespeare shown in my previous video: 'Kepler's Supernova Explodes the Stratfordian Myth!'
Рекомендации по теме
Комментарии
Автор

So grateful for these videos... each one that appears fills me with a fascination and a joy like finding hidden treasure. Thank you, Mr. Alexander Waugh, for exposing what is extant in contemporary historical record, rather than what has been "...agreed upon" latterly. God bless you, sir.

LeifGrahamsson
Автор

Great stuff. This is the most exciting thing happening in the Oxfordian movement right now, and I am eager to see how it is challenged and/or assimilated. Bravo!

mercedeslemp
Автор

Yet again a wonderful bit of research Alexander!

samuellloyd
Автор

Thank you yet again, Alexander! I so do treasure your thorough research on the subject and am excited to watch the next chapter..!
One question : How and why did Oxford's wife accept, that a newborn son, not being hers, became the 18th. Earl.?!
Are there any historic accounts regarding her view on the "shameful ordeal"?

jespermayland
Автор

I'm lagging behind but trying to catch up to your most interesting presentations as fast as possible (read: snail's pace). One very small and insubstantial correction here: Henry de Vere was 12 years old when Edward de Vere died, not 7. Keep up your important and fascinating work.

Short-Cipher
Автор

Another great one. I see the legitimacy issue obtains, no matter the context of Wriothsely's lineage; so, there's plenty of worthy secrets to be kept. I'm interested to see how all the strains play out. Here's two I've heard lately: Did de Vere engage others in his acquaintance to participate in the pseudonym? Did he consult fellow Masons or fraternal associates on legal or philosophical aspects?

russellmartocci
Автор

Thank you, Alexander. Great research and always presented so well.

firstnamesurname
Автор

Why does Holland spell star as Starre till after “The rape of fate” where it’s Star and has the only period in the entire poem? And is rape of fate a reference to the 18th not being related to the 17th, that would certainly be changing fate.

advancedfaces
Автор

I think I"m fairly convinced that I was your first subscriber.good work, blud

flipindisticalpictures
Автор

this is highly unlikely, but @6:10 with Ben Jonson's poem.. the cryptic crossword solver in me interpreted "say with rage" as an early smilie :-o ..add the o to "Or influence" and you get "Orion fluence", which accounts for the Orion in Holland's work.

baalbaalblacksheep
Автор

another sick video, blood...keep up the good work, bruv

flipindisticalpictures
Автор

Just curious, but how can an engraving of Ben Jonson made in 1615 or 1616 with a reference to the "CHAMPION (not vindicator) of recently buried genius" be a reference to the First Folio of 1623?

Jeffhowardmeade
Автор

Your translation of the inscription is wrong. Nothing like "Jonson is a recent vindicator of buried genius." It actually translates as "A warrior of genius freshly buried." Jonson was indeed a former soldier, a genius, and in 1640, three years after Jonson's death, recently buried. Rather than making any reference to Jonson's involvement with Shakespeare's First Folio, Holland is merely adding important biographical information about Jonson, recognizing his service to the Crown at war. But we're used to your not grasping Latin.

bomagosh
Автор

Sonnet 63
His beautie shall in these blacke lines be seen, }
'His beautie' is Wriothesley, 'these blacke lines' is Henry de Vere.
6 x 3 = 18. 18th Earl of Oxford
6 - 3 = 3. 3rd Earl of Shouthampton

johnanthony
Автор

Did Alexander say he put the link to the Kepler video in the description of this one?

rooruffneck
Автор

The 17th line, rape of fate. Edward did change his fate of not having a son. And the 18th line, more want such men, seems to referring to a person wanting to know their true heritage.

What does “Of ayrie Worthies rise up” means?

Why is “was borne the same he di'de.” italicizes and what does di’de mean?

advancedfaces
Автор

Couldnt the buried genious just be the knowledge of the ancients that he mentions after that?

erikuslatinevivit
Автор

Holland wrote two epitaphs for Henry DeVere, look at the first one at the last three lines. I looked up the word vnkinde, lacking in family affection with no respect for kinship. If the theory is correct these epitaphs are screaming it. Rereading them the first remind me of the 18th Earle and the second of the 17th

advancedfaces