For those who thinka headstock isn't heavy or changes ergonomics, try playing an SG on a strap and let go of the neck. You're always battling with the thing. Coming from someone who never touched a Strandberg
SynSpiderz
Having an instrument that has both headless and chambered brings to mind the guy who has built instruments on behalf of Brian May, Andrew Guyton. One model of his, the Transport Guitar, was designed to condense everything that’s great about the Brian May Red Special into an instrument that is so small, it can be taken anywhere. Imagine having an instrument that is headless and minuscule inside, yet it’s still loaded with the same type of pickups, electronics, bridge and semihollow cavities.
Shred_The_Weapon
Hell yeah Plini, saw him in Florida years ago and he fuckin ripped, ya love to see it
ThorBlevins
I wished people could keep their toxic comments to themselves. If you don't like the way a guitar looks just keep it to yourself.
robertg
No offense but the headless, high tech guitars came out in the '80s. Nothing new here.
robotflag
I hate the balance of a headless guitar
themixmusicandmore
The head is there so that there is a place for the logo. Otherwise, nobody knows what brand they should never buy.
Jm-s
I honestly don’t care headstocks are “heavy”… I just don’t like headless guitars, because the headstock is where the whole brand identify is..
Fender Strat, PRS Silver Sky, Suhr, MacMillan, you name it, if you remove the headstock, then they all look the same, they’re a Strat…
Spidouz
Being lighter does not make a guitar more ergonomic. That’s a salesman who is full of BS
TucoDog-hofw
If the head is too heavy...try eating some protein.
TheTikiMan
Headless makes it lighter? 😅 Yeah I hate those big heavy headstocks with their tuners and string trees and shit 🙄