Fixing Pydantic Serialization Errors in FastAPI with SQLAlchemy

Learn how to resolve serialization issues in FastAPI using Pydantic and SQLAlchemy's ORM. This guide simplifies the troubleshooting process for maintaining clean API responses.
---

Visit these links for original content and any more details, such as alternate solutions, latest updates/developments on topic, comments, revision history etc. For example, the original title of the Question was: Pydantic cannot serialize data FastAPI

If anything seems off to you, please feel free to write me at vlogize [AT] gmail [DOT] com.
---
Solving Pydantic Serialization Issues in FastAPI

FastAPI is an incredible web framework that takes advantage of asynchronous programming and is backed by the reliability of Pydantic for data validation. However, as with any technology, developers may encounter unforeseen issues. A common problem that can frustrate developers is the serialization of data when using FastAPI with Pydantic and SQLAlchemy. If you’ve run into an error indicating that Pydantic cannot serialize your data, you’re in the right place. In this post, we'll explore the causes of this issue and how to effectively resolve it.

The Problem: Pydantic Cannot Serialize Data

When attempting to return a list of projects from your FastAPI application, you may encounter errors like the following:

[[See Video to Reveal this Text or Code Snippet]]

This error indicates that your response does not match the expected structure defined by the Pydantic model you're using. The error suggests that your response is nested in a "Project" object instead of adhering directly to the structure outlined in your SProject model.

Example Code:

[[See Video to Reveal this Text or Code Snippet]]

The Confusion:

While returning data using SQLAlchemy, you may see output like this:

[[See Video to Reveal this Text or Code Snippet]]

This nested structure is what causes the mismatch, since Pydantic expected a flat list of dictionaries, not a list of objects wrapped in another dictionary.

Solution: Adjusting the Response Model

To resolve this issue, you need to modify your response model to match the actual data structure being returned. There are two main approaches to achieve this.

Option 1: Modify Your Existing Model

You can create a new Pydantic model that represents the nested structure. Here's how to do that:

[[See Video to Reveal this Text or Code Snippet]]

Now, update your route to use this new response model.

[[See Video to Reveal this Text or Code Snippet]]

This approach allows you to keep your existing ORM structure, but ensures that FastAPI knows how to properly serialize the response.

Option 2: Adjust the Return Statement (Recommended)

Alternatively, you might prefer to flatten the output of your DAO method before returning it. This could be the preferred approach if you want to streamline your response:

Modify your DAO method to return data in the format Pydantic expects:

[[See Video to Reveal this Text or Code Snippet]]

This way, you’ll be directly returning objects that match the SProject model, eliminating the serialization error.

Conclusion

Encountering serialization errors while using FastAPI, Pydantic, and SQLAlchemy can be frustrating. However, with a clear understanding of your response structure and a little adjustment to your models or return statements, you can easily resolve these issues. By ensuring that your data is being returned in the correct format, you can leverage the power of FastAPI to deliver clean, validated JSON responses without a hitch. Whether you choose to modify your response model or refine your DAO, the goal is to ensure data consistency that aligns with Pydantic’s expectations.

If you continue to face issues, consider revisiting your data structures and checking for any additional layers of nesting that could impact serialization. Happy coding!