What Supreme Court justices say about Trump’s immunity claims

preview_player
Показать описание
The Supreme Court heard arguments over Donald Trump’s claim that presidents should be immune to criminal charges. While conservative justices appear skeptical presidents don’t need some protections, they seem unpersuaded that Trump should be completely immune. NBC’s Laura Jarrett reports for TODAY.

About: TODAY brings you the latest headlines and expert tips on money, health and parenting. We wake up every morning to give you and your family all you need to start your day. If it matters to you, it matters to us. We are in the people business. Subscribe to our channel for exclusive TODAY archival footage & our original web series.

Connect with TODAY Online!

About: TODAY All Day is a 24/7 streaming channel bringing you the top stories in news and pop culture, celebrity interviews, cooking, and more. All in one place.

#scotus #donaldtrump #politics
Рекомендации по теме
Комментарии
Автор

No human could wield unlimited power coupled with total impunity without producing disastrous results. It's just the way we are.

DrBill-bfrq
Автор

No one is above the law!!! Total presidential immunity shouldn’t even be discussed!!!!

gretchenwebster
Автор

They shouldn't take this case in the first place. It took 4 votes to accept the case, so whoever voted for this should be ashamed of themselves

mechak
Автор

The Supreme court intentionally hamstrung themselves on hypothetical questions that have no bearing whatsoever to the case at hand.

So without fully confirming the defendant's absurd assertion, they successfully served the defendant's underlying objective:

Indefinite delay.

justsayin...
Автор

We are witnessing the delegitimization of the Supreme Court in real time. Unbelievable.

size
Автор

On todays episode of as our toilet swirls.

larryneville
Автор

No problem immunity, just don’t commit a crime in office or out of office . No office duty should require Committing a crime. Period. No question

bobleroy
Автор

Nixon didn't have it. That's why we had years of Watergate.

keithlewis
Автор

Nobody tried to change the putcome of the election! We wanted a fair election and for all votes to be counted!

jessicaschulatz
Автор

Arent ambassadors living in the US immune from criminal prosecution?

DavidThomas-zqtu
Автор

Martin Luther King said: “Injustice anywhere is a threat to justice everywhere.

One.--
Автор

Sotomeyer needs to look at what Biden is doing and ask that question again.

thomasturner
Автор

He's also been Immune to paying his *Taxes* for years .

stantonfriedman
Автор

So the only thing is to vote blue and let him get convicted after November. 😡😡😡🤦

maryadair
Автор

They’ll send it back to the lower courts, delay delays and more delays.🤮

tj-
Автор

The whole world knows the truth and is agast at the corruption that is being perpetrated with this court.. How shameful and disgusting..

God_help_us.
Автор

WHO SAYS THE IMMUNITY APPLICATION WAS FOR 6TH OF JANUARY ISSUE ONLY????

AnthonyCDreyer
Автор

let's get the biden Tara Reade trial started Now.

andrewherman
Автор

Supreme court needs to be replaced. This is the most obsurd argument one could possibly conjure.

michaelthompson
Автор

Democrats are embarrassing themselves with these petty trials. Get another candidate other than Biden if you want to win

t-bonesteak