Rajdeep Sardesai Speaks To Shashi Tharoor On His 'Chaiwala Modi' Jibe | News Today

preview_player
Показать описание
Rajdeep Sardesai spoke to senior Congress leader #ShashiTharoor about his latest controversial comment, where he called PM Narendra Modi a 'chaiwala' and said that he had become a prime minister only because of the institutional structures created by Jawaharlal Nehru. Tharoor clarifies that he never meant to demean anyone through his statement. Watch the full interview here. #NehruLegacyWar #ChaiwalaModi #NewsToday

Subscribe to India Today for NEW VIDEOS EVERY DAY and make sure to enable Push Notifications so you'll never miss a new video.

All you need to do is PRESS THE BELL ICON next to the Subscribe button! India Today TV is India's leading English News Channel. India Today YouTube channel offers latest news videos on Politics, Business, Cricket, Bollywood, Lifestyle, Auto, Technology, Travel, Entertainment and a lot more.

Stay tuned for latest updates and in-depth analysis of news from India and around the world!

Рекомендации по теме
Комментарии
Автор

Narendra modi himself says he was a chaiwala but the issue is when opposition call him a chaiwala

shaadalam
Автор

Bakths are irritated to hear the truth. They love modi's false allegations and Arnab's blunder lies.

openminded
Автор

Shashi Tharoor!! You would have also said it was because of the great leaders who led the foundation that you got freedom of speech
Today’s sold media who sell their religion (Journalism) just for their TRP & just for a sake of debate creating difference between Indians.
Things would be different right now

shadabaairah
Автор

Beautifully explained by Mr. Shashi Tharoor ji. I never looked at it that way. Mr. Nehru was actually good only.

nasdoc
Автор

NEHRU himself was an obedient  CHAIWALA.
But it was  ONLY to serve LADY MOUNTBATTEN and that too  when LORD MOUNTBATTEN was NO WHERE NEAR.

mohanank
Автор

Why don't people remember the likes of Dr Ambedkar?
Is he to be forgotten in the contribution towards establishing a functional democracy?

nishaad
Автор

Nehru enjoyed 17 years of total authority because u had all the rightful leaders from removed out of the way. The most prominent example is Netaji Subhash Chandra bose. He was d real leader of this country not Nehru. And u said nehru never succumbed to dictatorship. That was the biggest joke of the century. The man who imposed a dynastic rule on us, against whose authority nobody spoke up. What more example can u get of a dictator? What kind of a democracy did nehru blv in when he himself was not democratically elected as congress president. He became a selectd prime minister not an elected one. The last elected congress president was Netaji Subhash Chandra Bose of the congress party. After that nobody was elected fairly.

saunaksengupta
Автор

Constitution of India was the creation of Dr BR Ambedkar . Not Nehru

nyusa
Автор

Real Ram rajya was in Nehru time.
Currently under Modi it is Ravan raj

shivendrasingh
Автор

Hahahaha 😁😁😁😁😁😁
That's why he's called a paradoxical pm.
When he says I'm a chaiwala, it's boast. But when other says he's a chaiwala, then it's demeaning... 😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂
This is the real paradox

masteduv
Автор

If bjp says chaiwala, they feel proud & if any body else says then they feel insulted , fool Modi bhagat

vsba
Автор

If one goes by history Nehru has never felt any pride in Indian culture and the same is being continued byhis successive dynasty Shasi Taroor must remember that before the advent of mugals
andBritish Bharat was the most prosperous nation excelling in all fields But because of our ingrained tolerance and adherence to Truth and Dharma we lost space to invaders during the lost 700 years It is high time that I ndia recaptures the past glory and shine as an exemplary nation Modi is certainly paving the way in that direction

gopalakrishnan
Автор

Nehru's legacy is far greater than his mistakes or failures. BJP & RSS are always cynically critical of Nehru. Except Late Shri Atal Bajpai, who acknowledged Nehru's achievements in his speech in Loksabha when he was a PM.
Only a great person like Shri Bajpai can recognise greatness of another person.

shantaramvalke
Автор

Shashi tharoor is partially correct but main credit goes to Indian Hindu majority population who despite being religious are not indoctrinated like Islamic population .Along with this Hindus including their social reformers accepted liberal Western education while Islam forcefully rejected that.This tolerance led to a democratic nation and Nehru's credit remains in using that opportunity.

In Asia, mostly non Muslim majority countries are successful democracies {Japan, South Korea}.I would prefer communist China and even dictator ruled north Korea over any Muslim majority nation as minorities know very well about their limited rights and options in Islamic majority country.

eternalindian
Автор

Yes, Mr.Tharoor is right in a way. Nehru built institutions which kept his dynasty in power for last 70 years and kept Indian populace in poverty.

AdityamAmogham
Автор

Do you have any idea about united koria and the issues that occurred and the bloodshed occurred.. if India have followed the Korean example it could have been split into a minimum 18 countries

AjuFrancis
Автор

The irony is that nehru himself couldnot instill democracy with in congress party ..He is saying Nehru instilled Democracy in india ...my foot..

c.nbhaskar
Автор

I don't understand d obsession of Congress with Gandhi family....
Is Rahul Gandhi really deserve to head a national party in a country having 1.3 billion people ???

whnjuzv
Автор

If Nehru created democratic institutions in India, why dosen't Tharoor and Congress politicians talk about the emergency rule during Indira Gandhi's rule ?

JitendraSikotra
Автор

No doubt he did very good things for india but simultaneously he sheltered Dalai lama thus creating an enemy no one that is China and while forces were gaining ground in kashmir he went to uno for cease fire thus keeping the kashmir problem alive till date, above all congress govt's never claimed that pok is our part of kashmir instead always defended the our part of kashmir.Refuges from pok never given indian citizenship instead it was otherwise in case of other communities, a lot to say but these are some.

sushilhandu