filmov
tv
Hitler's Socialism | Destroying the Denialist Counter Arguments
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/23103/231030d6fed9e8e089a442576588d8a9f02b5505" alt="preview_player"
Показать описание
"I am a socialist.” - Hitler, from his "Zweites Buch" (Second Book) Page 50.
Some continue to believe that Hitler and National Socialism wasn't REAL (National) Socialism. Some believe that the totalitarian State of the Third Reich had no power at all, and that the market was 'free'. They want to believe that Hitler and his State had NO control over the economy, and that the ideology of National Socialism didn't call for the creation of a 'People's State' after the conquest of Lebensraum. Yes, 80 years after the events in question, many are still pushing a contradictory narrative that directly goes against the colossal amount of evidence pointing towards the opposite conclusion, and then refuse to even consider the possibility that they might be wrong in their interpretation. Well today, we will walk through numerous primary and secondary sources, show the substantial amount of flaws in the denialist argument, and present a solid interpretation of the evidence that makes much more sense than the denialist argument ever has.
I am NOT a Fascist, NOT a National Socialist, and NOT a Marxist Socialist. And I am NOT promoting said ideologies. This video is discussing events or concepts that are academic, educational and historical in nature. This video is for informational purposes and was created so we may better understand the past and learn from the mistakes others have made.
BIBLIOGRAPHY / SOURCES
The 107 sources used in this video -
TIME STAMPS
Introduction 00:00
Section 1: The Premise of my Argument 00:06:11
Section 2: Definitions
Part 1: Socialism and Capitalism 00:11:10
Part 2: The Definition Debate 00:14:31
Section 3: The Value Debate
Part 1: Value in Society 00:32:08
Part 2: Labour vs Subjective Theories of Value 00:39:39
Section 4: The Crisis of Capitalism?
Part 1: The “Tendency of the Rate of Profit to Fall” (Fallacy) 00:46:32
Part 2: Capitalism is Failing? 00:49:56
Part 3: The “Shrinking Markets” Debate 01:02:36
Part 4: ‘Fascist Imperialism’ Debunked 01:21:31
Section 5: National Socialist Economic Ideology [MUST WATCH THIS SECTION]
Part 1: National Socialism’s Fundamental Ideological Flaw 01:24:54
Part 2: The ‘Jewish World Conspiracy’ 01:42:56
Part 3: Hitler Fights ‘Jewish Capital’ 01:55:15
Part 4: Racial-Socialism 01:58:55
Part 5: Totalitarianism 02:05:22
Section 6: The Nazi Economy [PLEASE WATCH SECTION 5 BEFORE YOU WATCH THIS SECTION]
Part 1: ‘Privatization’ 02:10:18
Part 2: ‘Crushing’ the Trade Unions 02:44:33
Part 3: Down with Profit 02:47:15
Part 4: Nazi Commissars 02:59:51
Part 5: Collective Agriculture 03:10:08
Part 6: IG Farben vs the Market Economy 03:19:32
Part 7: The Imploding Social Justice Community 03:35:17
Part 8: The Plunder of Europe 03:43:10
Section 7: The Holocaust & Denialism 03:52:06
Section 8: Other Counterarguments
Part 1: “But the ‘Market’ Still Existed!” 04:01:33
Part 2: The “Hitler Killed Ernst Röhm” Fallacy 04:08:00
Part 3: Whataboutism 04:14:44
Part 4: “Historians Don’t Agree with TIK” 04:18:16
Part 5: TIK vs Academia 04:27:04
Part 6: “TIK is Mentally ill” 04:43:42
Section 9: Conclusion & Summary 04:50:30
- - - - -
RELATED VIDEO LINKS
My “Why I'm Passionate about HISTORY and What Got Me Into it” video
- - - - -
SUPPORT TIK
Some continue to believe that Hitler and National Socialism wasn't REAL (National) Socialism. Some believe that the totalitarian State of the Third Reich had no power at all, and that the market was 'free'. They want to believe that Hitler and his State had NO control over the economy, and that the ideology of National Socialism didn't call for the creation of a 'People's State' after the conquest of Lebensraum. Yes, 80 years after the events in question, many are still pushing a contradictory narrative that directly goes against the colossal amount of evidence pointing towards the opposite conclusion, and then refuse to even consider the possibility that they might be wrong in their interpretation. Well today, we will walk through numerous primary and secondary sources, show the substantial amount of flaws in the denialist argument, and present a solid interpretation of the evidence that makes much more sense than the denialist argument ever has.
I am NOT a Fascist, NOT a National Socialist, and NOT a Marxist Socialist. And I am NOT promoting said ideologies. This video is discussing events or concepts that are academic, educational and historical in nature. This video is for informational purposes and was created so we may better understand the past and learn from the mistakes others have made.
BIBLIOGRAPHY / SOURCES
The 107 sources used in this video -
TIME STAMPS
Introduction 00:00
Section 1: The Premise of my Argument 00:06:11
Section 2: Definitions
Part 1: Socialism and Capitalism 00:11:10
Part 2: The Definition Debate 00:14:31
Section 3: The Value Debate
Part 1: Value in Society 00:32:08
Part 2: Labour vs Subjective Theories of Value 00:39:39
Section 4: The Crisis of Capitalism?
Part 1: The “Tendency of the Rate of Profit to Fall” (Fallacy) 00:46:32
Part 2: Capitalism is Failing? 00:49:56
Part 3: The “Shrinking Markets” Debate 01:02:36
Part 4: ‘Fascist Imperialism’ Debunked 01:21:31
Section 5: National Socialist Economic Ideology [MUST WATCH THIS SECTION]
Part 1: National Socialism’s Fundamental Ideological Flaw 01:24:54
Part 2: The ‘Jewish World Conspiracy’ 01:42:56
Part 3: Hitler Fights ‘Jewish Capital’ 01:55:15
Part 4: Racial-Socialism 01:58:55
Part 5: Totalitarianism 02:05:22
Section 6: The Nazi Economy [PLEASE WATCH SECTION 5 BEFORE YOU WATCH THIS SECTION]
Part 1: ‘Privatization’ 02:10:18
Part 2: ‘Crushing’ the Trade Unions 02:44:33
Part 3: Down with Profit 02:47:15
Part 4: Nazi Commissars 02:59:51
Part 5: Collective Agriculture 03:10:08
Part 6: IG Farben vs the Market Economy 03:19:32
Part 7: The Imploding Social Justice Community 03:35:17
Part 8: The Plunder of Europe 03:43:10
Section 7: The Holocaust & Denialism 03:52:06
Section 8: Other Counterarguments
Part 1: “But the ‘Market’ Still Existed!” 04:01:33
Part 2: The “Hitler Killed Ernst Röhm” Fallacy 04:08:00
Part 3: Whataboutism 04:14:44
Part 4: “Historians Don’t Agree with TIK” 04:18:16
Part 5: TIK vs Academia 04:27:04
Part 6: “TIK is Mentally ill” 04:43:42
Section 9: Conclusion & Summary 04:50:30
- - - - -
RELATED VIDEO LINKS
My “Why I'm Passionate about HISTORY and What Got Me Into it” video
- - - - -
SUPPORT TIK
Комментарии