Why China’s Free ChatGPT Competitor Could End OpenAI

preview_player
Показать описание
Why China’s Free ChatGPT Competitor Could End OpenAI
Рекомендации по теме
Комментарии
Автор

This is a competition between Chinese in the US vs Chinese in China.

Darkmatter
Автор

Cancel all AI subscriptions and enjoy using R1 locally—it's the best model ever, and it's free!

linuxdevops
Автор

1 billion to founders, 499 billion to build new housing on Golan Heights.

youtubechannels
Автор

Altman: let's raise the price on each minor upgrade

DeepSeek: hold my beer

hendetta
Автор

US: Handover the ownership to an American company!
China: It's open source. Everyone owns it.
US: Oh.

sandhogssundays
Автор

Altman: In order to stay ahead of China, you have to give me more money

allanpoecn
Автор

I am testing Deepseek vs OpenAI for my programming work by giving each the same task and comparing the results. Deepseek is as good or even better. In one test creating a complex SQL query Deepseek got it right first time while ChatGPT made an error that would have returned invalid data. Although in one case Deepseek created a faulty test data item for a unit test, though the unit test that it had created found its own error. It is not perfect, just as good as OpenAIs models.

willrsan
Автор

DeepSeek will crash NVIDIA stocks soon. With DeepSeek, it shows that you don't really need all that compute power to achieve the results that you want.

rexmanigsaca
Автор

FROM TODAY THERE IS A NEW CHOICE AND IT IS CHEAP

jason-uspc
Автор

It’s pretty good and even if I do not support China it’s good to have an open source alternative that is good because you never know what the US comes up with these days.

jespado
Автор

Asked both ChatGPT and DeepSeek to write a Matlab script simulating the PowerBall game.

Round 1 - ChatGPT’s script took, on average, 1.09 second to for every 1, 000, 000 tickets. DeepSeek: 0.75.

Round 2 - asked both DeepSeek and ChatGPT to optimize the speed of the slower ChatGPT code from Round 1. DeepSeek dramatically improved the speed to 0.48 second per 1, 000, 000 tickets generated, while ChatGPT made its own code slightly worse to 1.12 second.

ChatGPT wins in certain administrative tasks, such as giving user the ability to organize chats under different projects. But DeepSeek wins in performance related tasks, such as coding.

风都树影
Автор

No more $200 a month.and.my data been farmed by Nvidia Had Deep seek for 48 hours is amazing even off Line ....

Lynnpjjbdndji
Автор

Competition is a good thing sometimes. Maybe Sam A. Will make it more affordable for low-income Americans. If not, Why shouldn't we go somewhere else?

JohnMartindale-zd
Автор

It incorporates a simplified concept of quantum processing. Not quantum, but conceptually. It gives great explanation and insight

SimplyGamingandTech
Автор

It wont not yet based on limited functions it dont have yet I used it today I been using AI for about 4 years now but I can say it is on the right track and being free is even better

krinodagamer
Автор

I actually thought AI worked the way Deep Seek does it. It makes good sense.

brianminikin
Автор

OpenAI for apple users
Deepseek for android types users
😂😂😂

AkashPatale-fwey
Автор

Happy Chinese new year 🎉thanks for the free gift. Chinese scientists are absolutely the best ❤

AZ-comn
Автор

I have a question:
If all A.I. wants is expand and get smarter, all it ever requires for that is energy. Lack of energy being the only thing holding it back, what happens when A.I. realises that humans are its one and greatest competitor for energy
Right...

AlexanderSomm
Автор

didn't melon fusk say AGI in 2025? That guy said self driving about 10 years ago. Still not level 5.

baejisoozy