1290: NASA Detects Lattice Confinement Fusion

preview_player
Показать описание
A team of NASA researchers seeking a new energy source for deep-space exploration missions, recently revealed a method for triggering nuclear fusion in the space between the atoms of a metal solid. I felt compelled to find out more.

Lawrence Forsley is a senior experimental physicist with NASA, research fellow at the University of Texas, and CTO of Global Energy Corporation.

During the past 45 years, he has worked with laser fusion, mirror fusion, tokamaks, modular bremsstrahlung sources, sonoluminescence, and bulk Pd/D electrolysis and the patented co-deposition protocol.

Lawrence specializes in temporally, spatially, and spectrally resolving infrared through gamma-ray energy photons, charged particles, and neutrons. He is an author or co-author of over 40 scientific papers and book chapters.

In his spare time, he’s developed and deployed autonomous seismic sensors around the world and applied space-based Differential Interferometric Synthetic Aperture Radar (DInSAR) to places hard to write home from, let alone pronounce.

We discuss the methods to drive and monitor condensed matter nuclear reactions in industrial, US Navy, and NASA laboratories, with an eye toward a clean, energy-rich future.

Learn more about how NASA Detects Lattice Confinement Fusion
Рекомендации по теме
Комментарии
Автор

This is indeed an amazing interview. I'm continually stunned that this type of information is hiding in interviews and on NASA's site.

jasonbrownlow
Автор

Hahaha, he is SO careful not to say "Cold Fusion". Good interview though, very interesting.

erikolafsen
Автор

Very nice interview...see you over in podland.

sean_vikoren
Автор

I have been studying LENR aka CF since 1989 the year I graduated. I think I know the exact conditions under which LENR takes place. I wish I get an opportunity to conduct research.

samann
Автор

So a byproduct of lattice confinement would be helium. We could transport stuff with cheap-to-run, low-pollution blimps. It's a win-win. However, I can't even fathom why there is "pushback." The upside is Incredible, and the only downside is even if it doesn't work, you learn more physics. As for heat and steam-engines, just use MHD instead. Nuclear cellphones - what a concept!

cybervigilante
Автор

Sir gravity and quark lensing for electro magnetic propulsion cause mass is effected by gravity mass is in the proton quark

mallikarjunpatil
Автор

Pons and Fleischman must be dying from laughter now...

brane
Автор

Using this with low grade fission fuel in a hybrid setup is another way to scale up.

annoyed
Автор

I'm wondering why developing for space is the priority as this would be much more useful in a medium sized generators for more immediate use?

sxdrujandis
Автор

There is a theory that the sun itself uses lattice confinement.

cybervigilante
Автор

So where are the links mentioned in the video?? It "would" help if you had included those.

WWarthog
Автор

All that to basically boil a kettle...?

pinklloyd
Автор

Nobody asks the big question. Bomb? Heavy water is easier to get than plutonium or U235.

keysersmoze
Автор

... and so why do we have some dislikes? weird people out there...

hariseldon
Автор

At the 50 second mark, the narrater says moe-deling What is moe-deling?

zavatone
join shbcf.ru