TITLEHOLDER or TRESSPASSER ?? One for the LAW nerds…

preview_player
Показать описание
I ran across this landlord-tenant eviction hearing in Judge Johnson’s court but it caught my eye and as I watched it turned out to be much more…no flashy outbursts, incoherent ramblings, sovtard’ (though it DOES include a quitclaim deed…one of their favorite tools), etc…but it’s a short, solid legally interesting hearing…. DISCLAIMER: I AM NOT AN ATTORNEY AND YOU WILL LEARN NOTHING FROM ME THAT ISNT PROVIDED BY LEGAL ZOOM 🤣🤣🤣🤣…but I found it and wanted to share…

If you enjoy please share the link and convince a couple friends, family members or co-workers to subscribe to the channel…would love to push thru 5k as fast as we hit the 2.5k mark…thanks to you all!

This remix is intended to provide better insight into how our courts and the folks who run them administer justice to the public they serve. Remember they have to deal with folks who are often having their worst day on a daily basis.

This commentary remix work constitutes a fair use of any copyrighted materials under section 107 of the US copyright law. Video was edited only to add relevant commentary and to reduce time in the hopes it will be more convenient to be viewed by more folks thereby raising public interest.
Рекомендации по теме
Комментарии
Автор

In Most Cases Of (TAX LIENS), A Property Is Sold (FREE AND CLEAR) Of Encumbrance.. Meaning, The Federal Government, State Government, County Government Or City Government Has Taken The Property And Put The Property Up For Sale For Past Due Debts.. Like Taxes Or Criminal Offenses.. Unless The Sale(s) State: NO WARRANTIES EXPRESSED OR IMPLIED.. Meaning These Type Government Sales DO NOT GUARANTEE OTHER LEINS ARE NOT ON THE PROPERTY.

Which Happens Very Seldomly.. Because Most People Stay Away From Property Sales/Tax Auctions That Aren't Guaranteed To Be (FREE AND CLEAR) Of Any And All Encumbrances.. The Government(s) Wouldn't Be Able To Sell The Property.. Which No Government Wants To Be Stuck With An Abandoned Property At Any Level Of Government.. Now, As Far As Buying A Home In A PRIVATE AUCTION.. Private Auctions Are Different.. And? So Are The Rule Of Purchasing A Property..

Private Auctions Can Be Far More Complex When It Comes To The Ownership Of A Property.. Which When Buying Properties, One Must Be EXTREMELY CAREFUL.. Because The Previous Owner Of The Property (MAY) Have Several Mortgages On The Property.. And, Determining Which POSITION You Are In When Buying A Property? May Cause Someone To Loose All Of Their Money Invested In The Property.. For Example.. IF The Current Owner Has THREE Mortgages On A Property.. That Means The Property Has THREE OWNERS..

With The Original Owner Being The 1st Position Owner, And The Second Mortgage Lender/Holder Being The Second Owner, And The Third Mortgage Lender/Holder Being The Third Owner.. Any ONE Of The THREE Are LEGALLY ALLOWED To Sell Off Their Mortage/Lein Hold On The Property At Any Time. However.. They CAN NOT TAKE POSSESSION Of The Property Unless The Owner In FIRST POSITION SELLS THEIR OWNERSHIP.. Which Would DROP THE NEW OWNER To The THIRD POSITION.. And, Unless The New Owner Can Pay Off The Other TWO Positions?

The Former Second Position Mortgage/Lein Holder Moves To First Position And Is Able To SELL The Property To A Buyer.. Which Would Mean All That The Person Who Bought The Property From The FIRST Position Holder Has? Is A Position In The Ownership Of The Property.. He/She WOULD NOT Have Rights To The Property As Far As Moving Into The Property.. Unless It Is Stated In The Contract By The New First And Second Position Holders.. And? That NEVER HAPPENS...

So Now We Have To Wait To See What Position Did This Woman Buy The Property In.. And? If The Person Claiming Ownership Is The Actual Owner.. Or? Did He Forge Documents.. Which Would Be An Entirely Different Case.. That's It In A Nutshell.. Yep...

commonman
Автор

This greasy real estate lawyer pissed me off with his condescending statement that the homeowner had 30 whole days to legally dispute his client's claim to her property, like the average person just has a lawyer on retainer & speed dial. Grrrr! As a land owner, one of my biggest fears is that someone will embroil my family in one of these nightmare cases. It happens entirely too often, where either a bank, a shell company, or one of those Sovcidiot groups files bogus paperwork & if the home/land owner doesn't receive notice, or doesn't know how to answer it, they can just start proceedings.

angeladansie
Автор

I understand land shenanigans are rampant in Detroit. If this lady's claims have merit it sounds like she got a great lawyer.

I think you're right, Mr. Babi is desperately trying to get a summary judgement so he can get out of there with his license unblemished.

dcviper
Автор

This lady found herself a very good attorney and her attorney is correct both about the application of the law and process as well as the significant importance of the case as it relates to his client. I enjoyed this case. I really enjoy your content format and comments. A side note, good for the lady for letting her very well versed attorney do the talking. He did an excellent job and got a good result in today's hearing. It would be interesting to follow this process

chrisyacoback
Автор

Is no one else thinking that the case is the LEAST INTERESTING thing in the courtroom? I'm seeing a 'Countess', someone drawing up a syringe and I am barely a minute in.

drgovernor
Автор

This is an interesting one. I’m definitely interested in updates. Marowske is an excellent example of being a zealous advocate for your client. Thanks for bringing us these!

DaydreamingThroughBooks
Автор

Very impressed with Mr Marowske, who earlier in this clip advises a fellow attorney before presenting to represent his client.
Mr Babi, on the other hand, does not know how to pronounce “scintilla” notwithstanding his law degree.

loisbolton
Автор

If it was sold at auction or tax sale it means she owed taxes, if she owns it why didn’t she pay the taxes. There are many questions about her ownership.

cdrone
Автор

In Oklahoma, a person is deemed a tresspasser only after the coroner's report and autopsy

bigal
Автор

Awesome job as always, OldSquishyG. I have zero knowledge for Michigan property law, but this was just really good lawyering on the part of Mr. Marowske. Thanks for the law nerd fix. Happy Monday. 🙃😉

Darci.
Автор

I don't like Babi because he said skintilla(not scintilla) 😂

spannymakronkeep
Автор

Is there any way to find the follow up for this? I am interested in seeing what the research found. The woman may, or may not, legally own the house depending on the findings. But, if she was defrauded when giving the deed, someone needs to be held accountable.

Mtnred
Автор

Thanks for the upload! Most landlord/tenant proceedings are very dry and samey, but this is very interesting. I hope we get to see the follow-up proceedings in this case here too.

notrab
Автор

This is shady shady 🌴 palm tree!
Her attorney said she holds the property under ‘color of title’. Then the buyer holds a defective deed does not have good title or full ownership of the property.

-How did she get color of title?

Answer: A trespasser can bring a claim of adverse possession after three years. However, he or she must establish "color of title" – meaning that the trespasser has some sort of deed or conveyance, albeit perhaps a mistaken one, that shows that he or she is a record title owner.

Most likely and most cases;
she has been living free for ten years
or someone SCAMMED her and sold her a home that was not theirs to sell.
Or I am way off. That’s my understanding of color of title!
DONT BUY A HOME WITH OUT TITLE INSURANCE!

MortgageGirl
Автор

Quieting the title takes a very long time because all the claimants have to be investigated. Sounds very fishy to me as a former title/escrow person. Someone has screwed her over.

Mtnred
Автор

OSG, do we know what happened at the followup hearing on February 7th? I’m intrigued by this one 👀😊💐

goosebump
Автор

Crazy, no way of telling who's speaking the truth . But someone needs to go to prison

bubbasmith
Автор

Why would they send the assistance to the tenant. It should goto the landlord. Period. If they needed rental assistance so bad. What if that prevented someone who needed it from getting it

WhiteTornadoGaming
Автор

Something is quite amiss here. It's not factual evidence, but there was body language from the lady that made me question things. That said, 10 years she's been there, the notary was on both documents and that attorney is really trying to get a quick ending, there is something funny going on somewhere. There are lot's of questions that were not asked or discussed such as taxes, deeds, title search documents from the transfers not to mention, mortgage documents. I don't think even a half way decent lender would put out money on a property with a questionable title. I think the next hearing with the discovery will be quite enlightening.

frlfda
Автор

How is driving while on court not contempt, never mind highly dangerous?

paulberry