Law Professor explains US v Apple, the iPhone Monopoly Case

preview_player
Показать описание
Prof. Eric E. Johnson dives into the iPhone monopolization accusations and the law behind them in the government's blockbuster antitrust lawsuit against Apple. This video reviews what's needed for a Sherman Act Section 2 claim and identifies the three key questions that will determine the outcome of this litigation. It's not a hot take -- just a careful and clear account of the government's case.

#antitrust #iPhone #law #appleiphone #monopoly #Apple #applewatch

00:21 Apple's hugeness
00:38 iPhone in a massive C-clamp?
01:00 The essence of the claim
01:12 The legal basis -- Sherman Act §2
01:38 The offense of monopolization (monopolize vs. having a monopoly)
02:11 The three key questions in U.S. v. Apple
02:45 Question #1: What counts as a relevant market?
05:33 Question #2: Does Apple have monopoly power?
06:46 Question #3: Has Apple done anticompetitive things to get or keep monopoly power?
07:52 Super apps
08:57 Cloud gaming tech
10:30 iMessage compatibility, smartwatch compatibility, digital wallets
11:21 Apple's privacy and security justifications

Theme music by @SpaceKnife
Video by Eric E. Johnson
Copyright 2024 Eric E. Johnson
Рекомендации по теме
Комментарии
Автор

More detailed than the other videos. Enjoyed it, but can be slightly more info-densed. Keep it up!

timothychng
Автор

No other phones offer easy ability to use the phone. Why switch. I tried a Samsung they suck.

thanniss
join shbcf.ru