HEAD TO HEAD - RECIPROCATING SAW - MILWAUKEE Super Sawzall vs MILWAUKEE Sawzall (2722-20 vs 2821-20)

preview_player
Показать описание
This head to head comparison is between the Milwaukee Tool M18 FUEL Super SAWZALL 2722-20 and the Milwaukee Tool M18 FUEL Sawzall 2821-20

A break-down of the times:

| 2x10 | 4x6 | Galvanized Pipe | Cast Iron Pipe |
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Super Sawzall | 13.36 | 15.24 | 22.72 | 49.72 |
Sawzall | 11.48 | 9.84 | 15.40 | 50.68 |

Be sure to subscribe and turn on notifications so you'll know as soon as the next head to head challenge is posted!
=============================================

For more behind the scenes and day-to-day content check out my Instagram page!

=============================================

Check out our website for in-depth reviews and high-def pictures of all tools I get my hands on! Striving to provide honest and straight-forward reviews and opinions - as if you're hearing an opinion from your coworker while on the job site. Less press release regurgitation and more trustworthy hands-on experience!

=============================================
GEAR I USE:
=============================================
Рекомендации по теме
Комментарии
Автор

So wait... The regular is faster than the super in all tests?

ang
Автор

Odd doing a test like this without a new blade in each saw.

intox
Автор

Not only did you fail to use a fresh new blade during testing, obscureing the results. you also failed to highlight the other improvement changes the 2821 has. Such as an upgraded slide crank mechanism wich protects against water and dust. Anti-corrosion blade clamp, wear-resistant blade change lever, reinforced battery connection.things that don't impact your testing but should influence a buyers choice.

quchiliu
Автор

For a carpenter, the orbital mode is a game changer for demos. Just got a super and its night and day from the gen 2. And on top of that the gen 2 bogs and stops when you really get after it, but the super just keeps friggin going. Just my two cents!

samw
Автор

You should have put a new blade in for every cut.

FuctByTheGovernment
Автор

i love how all these experts in the trade have never heard of work hardening when it comes to cutting steels...

Migman
Автор

You don't have the orbital turned on the Super Sawzall. Test is invalid

jps
Автор

My buddy asked for one of these for his birthday. Both our houses are Milwaukee for cordless and too heavily invested in M18 to consider anything else. Looks like 2821 it is. The smaller body of the tool is an advantage as well. We work boat salvage and sometimes spaces are tight. Every inch can count. I'll peruse a few more videos before making a decision but I appreciate the video.

simpledjchromo
Автор

I have both and the normal gen 2 is better and superior to the super sawzall. The super sawzall does not feel any stronger or faster but it’s significantly heavier and it cost more. I pretty much always use the gen 2 sawzall and never touch the super sawzall anymore.

riceball
Автор

Set the 2722-20 on orbital then redo the test.

landsurfer
Автор

Earned a 👍 from me if I were to give any comments other than that it was a great comparison and break down of the two I’d say the super sawzall might perform better under heavier load/ higher resistance I don’t know as I’m yet to test mine again my new sawzall it’s in the post but it would be interesting to see the results of the same test with say double the weight on the saws

johncarne
Автор

Great Video! shout out from Tijuana, Mexico! ManCaverTools Recommended your channel!

MarlonSanchez
Автор

Is the Gen 2 sawzall basically faster at cutting than the super sawzall when not in orbital mode? Why is the Gen 2 sawzall faster? I thought the super sawzall has a more powerful motor and that even in normal mode it should be faster…

marktebb
Автор

That mean m18 fuel sawzall more powerfull than m18 super sawzall right?

johnkedah
Автор

I was about to ask why it’s so expensive in the us when it’s only 179 here in Canada but then I realized this is the fuel ones

dantekania
Автор

Why didn’t you use a new blade for the second one??

adrianavila
Автор

Don't waste you're money keep the regular gen 2. I've used both for cutting tons of limbs and it's the same results

MiguelTorres-erzw
Автор

I prefer the supers blade change it's all metal. The regular gets gunked up with stuff especially drywall dust and jams then you break the lever trying to get it free

jake
Автор

That is not a accurate test. U need a new blade for every test. But, I appreciate your time you invested and your video.

juancarlosmunoz
Автор

So I have a guy who will sell me either for the same price point !

Which one do I get ? What is the better buy ?

aronp