Why wasn't the Greenfield tornado rated an EF-5?

preview_player
Показать описание
The road to recovery is still just beginning in Greenfield, but some discussions over the rating of the tornado that struck the town on May 21st are already in progress.
Рекомендации по теме
Комментарии
Автор

You could have a 3 mile wide 400mph tornado in the middle of nowhere, and it would be an ef0 because it didn't cause damage. The scale needs to be reworked

TheDjcobra
Автор

Never mind the fact that a well built home, recent construction, that was anchored to its foundation, was not just leveled, that was completely swept away with nearby trees debarked. The same case could be made for Mayfield Kentucky as well as Rochelle, Illinois.

mjw
Автор

The rating system needs to account for windspeeds detected by rader at least from 300 ft above ground and under.

StevenSagerIsSuperEpic
Автор

I've been saying for months this tornado should've been rated EF5. Winds over 200 MPH detected? Check, up 300+ were detected. Damage consistent with EF5 damage? Well the conversation below me says enough; I've seen photos of the damage too. By comparison, I almost thought I was looking at photos of damage caused by the 2013 tornado in Moore.

paivioselanne
Автор

If you close your eyes and listen to this guys voice, he sounds like NileRed almost exactly

sumicmusic
Автор

Need to go back to the original Fujita scale

ChrisMorrow-cxrb