Fermilab 2021 year in review

For Fermilab, 2021 was a momentous year that included major science results, construction progress, record-setting equipment, and more. Get a quick recap of 2021 milestones in this video that features drone and timelapse footage from around the lab.

Ten ways Fermilab advanced science and technology in 2021:

Fermilab website:

[yaboy]

Love the content, looking forward to 2022!

[creativedude]

Hi
I am a student of class 9th.I have a question, may you please answer it? This question now became my head ache. The question is that why the electrons doesn't radiate energy while it revolving around the nucleud?
If this can be proved.then is it not break the electromagnetic theory of physics.

[peterkelley]

Seems odd they did not provide hints for the 2022 year.

[cienciademais]

can I subtitle this video in Portuguese and put it on my channel?

[Frankness]

I imagine the music for this video is what Dr. Don listens to in his car on the way to work.

[vladimirshiltsev]

First-ever demo of the optical stochastic cooling was an exciting breakthrough, too...

[sandbridgekid]

We still need to build the Super Conducting Super Collider and the Other Things. Not because they are easy, but because they are HARD.

[ruttolomeo]

On behalf of humankind I'd like to thank each and every member of Fermilab for their relentless contribution in the pursuit of truth among the deepest misteries of this big old Universe. Also, I'd like to forward a special THANK YOU to Mr. Enrico Fermi, who not only single-handedly created the most exciting field of Science, not only is giving name to the second most prestigious laboratory of quantum physics in the entire World, but despite being long-dead still brightens up with honor the most noble and wondeful of all human cultures, a culture that in 2021 won basically every sport competition that matters and is handling the pandemic like no one else in Europe. Thank you Italy, you have always ruled this world and you will always do it.

[MrDavidfuchser]

I also hear Alexander Unzicker will be Fermilabs new spokesperson going forward. I can't wait!

[gaussianvector]

I don't understand how entanglement doesn't contradict causality

I picture Bob and Alice agreeing that an odd number of up spins for Alice will be a one, and even -> zero, with long breaks in between.

Then Bob travels far away and passes this information on through Bob Jr. Jr. Jr. Jr. (Same for Alice's great great great Great-grandchildren)

What stops the Bob's communication with the Alice's? Yes the measurements are random but she can choose where to stop?

I am stumped on this one.

[dr.merlot]

I didn't know Fermi lab had cracked roads and cows.

[brewdog]

It amazes me that we use such large complicated looking machines to learn about the oh so very small.

[aladdin]

Especially as a theist i highly appreciate Dr. Don Lincoln's empirically based honesty compared to theoretical physicists like Brian Greene, who try to press their ideology into science.
When the serious, down-to-earth circle of scientists instead has no verifiable proofs to support a theory, Dr. Lincoln admits "We don't know."
I watched many self proclaimed experts, so called YT educators about nature science, but Dr. Don Lincoln seems to be one of the most qualified, neutral and unbiased persons in physics. I learned a lot and i am still learning. Thank You

[neIntangible]

I wish this had been a little bit longer giving some more details. Although I am a subscriber and have kept up with following the major developments over the past couple of years or so, it would have been nice to spend a couple of minutes on each one for those new to this channel, as well as refreshing my memory bank.

[williamminer]

Just don't disagree with them they will make up charges and fire you

[Corvaire]

That's pretty impressive considering the situation we're all in at the moment. Bravo! ;O)-

[ricardomotagomes]

🙌🏻🙌🏻🙌🏻🙌🏻🙌🏻🙌🏻 !!! … 👍🏻👍🏻👍🏻👍🏻👍🏻👍🏻 !!! … 👏🏻👏🏻👏🏻👏🏻👏🏻👏🏻 !!! …

[djsandbird]

Some questions that I can't find answers to:

I understand the idea of the viewable universe (46B years for each side), the idea that we will never be able to visit a small part of it because of the expansion process. I also understand that over time objects that we can see now we'll not be able to see them in the future. All make seance.

The problem is big bang itself:

I can see everywhere the same answer "The center of the universe is everywhere" but no one explaining it. I tried to think about it. There's a great hint "the big bang was not an explosion like a bomb". Also if the universe been started from one point then we'll not be able to see 46B light years for each side.

So as I see it maybe after big bang all the universe was filled with that cosmic radiation or whatever. So the universe is infinity and started in infinity size and the only change is the matter inside it. Am I right?

I'm understanding the dark matter thing: without it the gravitation calculation will be wrong. That's easy to understand.

Theory of relativity and the speed of light questions:

It's easy to understand that if what we see is effected by the speed of light. If I'm flying at speed of light then what I'll see will stop. If I'm flying over the speed of light then I'll started to see "the past".

The problem is that we can't really go to the past. It's just what we see. So how the twin paradox is even possible? the time is really always staying the same.

Why we can't pass the speed of light?

String theory:

There's no (real) explanation to it anywhere. It's like the answer "there's no center to the universe" answer without explaining why.

[Parapresdokian]

Tripped Intern hacked fermi lab YouTube

[mountfairweather]

Dr Dan Lincoln that's what we wanna see