Can You Spot the Fake? AI Video vs. Real Life Challenge!

Think you can tell the difference between real life and AI-generated videos? Join David as we put your skills to the test in this fun "Spot The Difference" challenge!

We'll show you stunning drone footage, adorable animals, and close-up shots, side by side with real video. Can you guess which ones are created by AI? Plus, learn some telltale signs to identify AI-made videos and see just how good this technology has become.

PS. Let us know your score in the comments!

All AI video generated by OpenAI's Sora.

🎁 Join this channel to get access to perks:

👋 Get Social With Payette Forward:

📺 Follow the Editor:

[Jennifermcintyre]

It’s already scary how people can make ANYONE appear to be saying ANYTHING!!

[snappycattimesten]

Plot twist: the presenter in this video is AI.

Too fast not enough time to examine both videos

[peterschmidt]

If I did nor know there was a choice I would not have assumed many were faked.

[juiced]

A lot of the AI videos have a smoother movement to them. I only missed one.

[annieo.]

This is scary. Except for the cat with 3 front paws and the lights off in the gallery, the rest were still hard to spot even after you pointed them out. Hard to believe anything anymore unless you are living it.

[viazel]

I Missed 4 and 5! But the animation was scary. I give them 2 years and we will be in trouble. This was great please do another with current technology involved.
Thank you!

[NDAsDontCoverIllegalActs]

The eye version was the most obvious to me.

[whymustisigninthis]

I don’t know if anyone else is experiencing this but since I’ve seen the sora ai videos I now question a lot of video, to the point that now a lot of video, even totally real stuff, looks a bit fake to me. We really need to label AI content. Otherwise we’ll end up trusting nothing.

[xzlwnk]

0:30 "The water looks really weird." Dude, one of the people literally disappeared.

[JazzyJan]

Surprised I even got 4 right. Very hard to tell.

[AndyJP]

I only got 1 wrong but what was interesting is that the AI mistakes you noticed were completely different than what I noticed

[isapluschke]

This was a learning curve for me, thank you

[debatable]

I got all right, but i feel it’s important to note that we are judging this when we’re explicitly told one is AI and we have a definitive comparison. If I came across any of these in short form content, I probably would have assumed most were real. Which is terrifying.

[eghtimx]

Helpful, I got quite a few wrong, just shows can’t always believe what you see.

[ashcam]

Plot twist... the whole thing was hosted by an AI

[DeniseSchultz]

We need a whole new kind of discernment to be good citizens. It would help to pace the examples slower with a longer pause of not talking. I hope you do a regular series of these, it is going to be a very important skill. (I flunked.)

[professional.commentator]

5:41 That will probably happen next year.

[raspas]

Use words appropriately. Water doesn't look "really weird". It looks extremely close to how water would look. It looks more like water than animation could do. In actuality I think only frame rate is a bit slower. Really weird would be pink dots or something

[ramslade]

I only missed two — but the close-up shot of the old man was so convincing, I had to double take, and even then, I couldn't even tell it was AI. I thought the ear looked weird, but just attributed that to old people things.