Neumann KH80 DSP vs Focal Shape 40 || Sound & Frequency Response Comparison

preview_player
Показать описание
----------------------------

Follow me on:
-----------------------------

Contact me at:
----------------------------

Timestamps:
00:00​ - 00:17​ Intro
00:17 - 01:17 Jazz Con Cajon
01:17 - 02:23 Deep
02:23 - 03:29​ Metal Head
03:29​ - 04:36​ Long Night
04:36 - 06:04 Bellissimo
06:04 - 07:31 Mortals
07:31 - 08:44 Retro Wave
08:44 - 09:50 Inspiring Middle East​
09:50 - 10:58 Return To The Wild
--------------------------

All the tracks used in this video can be found here:
----------------------------

-Sound recorded using pair of SE Electronics SE8 mics and Zoom H6 recorder
-Frequency measurements done in semi treated room using UMIK-1 microphone
-Levels matched using SPL meter
-All tone controls set to neutral
Рекомендации по теме
Комментарии
Автор

wow the KH80s are by far the best out of the two! The KH80s are incredible!

djrobtech
Автор

Wow, the Nuemann and Focal sounded near identical in Metal Head. I would give the edge to the Focals though, it has a more transparent high end. Only thing that goes to the Neumann is the bass.

AbsoluteFidelity
Автор

I like Neumann sound :) But Focal is not too bad.

mlsterlous
Автор

Слушаю тест сегодня на полочниках.Нойманы звучат мяснее, а Фокалы серединку выделяют.Интереснр мнение других🤘

evergreensound
Автор

Shape 40 sonically has more vocal characteristics. There's a bump at 1 to 2kHz while not being hyped. Nice mid.
Shape 40 is also very transparent (above lower mid-range), but maybe this is somewhat because of lacking bass.
It's boomy without deep enough LF extension. Try to place them closer to the front wall and EQ(cut) the LF/LMF on the rear panel to justify the bass.
I wonder how Shape 50 vs KH 120 would be.

qqow
Автор

There are much more transient details with the focals and spacial information. The Neumanns sound muffled and less detailed and tight.

I am listening this test on professional monitors.

jesusvsmuhammad
Автор

To me, Neumann clearly has exaggerated base, while Focal gives a better presence due to more musical mids.

chacha
Автор

At Long night track so close the loudspeakers. At the Return to wild the Neumann more balanced. Generally the Focal have more mid high, what little weird because we can't see on response curve.
Thx the test again!

joewolf
Автор

I can hear a lot more of the mids information on the focals..it feels buried on the kh80. Incredible focals

tradehut
Автор

The extended bass makes the Neumanns sound better.

ancientalien
Автор

Wow. KH sounded awesome thru my Focal CMS 40, deep bass.

vinoheart
Автор

I came across in one store Takstar mt5, also good speakers for the price.

Евгений-бфч
Автор

The Neumann has a noticeably better bass extension. Would do a lot better than the Focal on techno/house.

goodboid
Автор

Naumanns are excelent as always, but focals are pretty acurate. That bump at 55hz for the neumanns, is it a room mode or is it an actual bump of the speakers?

vagelisda
Автор

Guys focal 380 neumann 500 ! Neumann sub 90watt ! Monitor to much different

MrAkOS
Автор

Can you make a7x or a8x comparison.This is my request ❤️❤️❤️

BeatzBd